Yes, I agree... What really seems missing is an ACCURATE definition fitting our diverse practice patterns.
I think AOTA has done an admirable job defining OT, but I don't think it's a definition which fits much of what is being practiced. Ron -- Ron Carson MHS, OT ----- Original Message ----- From: Mary Alice Cafiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subj: [OTlist] Would You Treat For Refer to PT? MAC> I think if we can come up with a way to define all the areas that OT MAC> can and does cover, we will gain more respect professionally and in MAC> the general population. MAC> MA -- Options? www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com Archive? www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
