Ron et al.....I have been trying to read most of the posts regarding this issue 
of articulating the difference of PT and OT, but, honestly, not all of the 
posts.  But, it seems you have been dealing with this since I have known you 
and the OTnow list serve.  And, it seems you want some conclusion on this.

But, your definition is way off.  I would not be a PT if I was limited by your 
definition.  I don't just work with people who have acute injuries and or 
impaired body parts.  I ask you look at the practice acts of the different 
states or the APTA Guide to PT.

I wish this issue didn't exist as I feel we are beating a dead horse.

>From a personal standpoint, I say, do what it is you do and be good at it.  If 
>you need to treat an impairment to improve a life skill, then do it.  If I 
>need to help a patient improve a functional skill using functional exercises, 
>I will do it.  The bottom line is the patient.

And, from the billing and reimbursment side, if you can do what you do and be 
reimbursed, great.  If I can do what I do and get reimbursed, great.

Let me do what I do at the body structure stage, the activity stage, or the 
participation stage.  And, I have no problems with you doing it, too.

Peace


David A. Lehman, PhD, PT
Associate Professor
Tennessee State University
Department of Physical Therapy
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.
Nashville, TN 37209
615-963-5946
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit my website:  http://www.tnstate.edu/interior.asp?mid=2410&ptid=1


This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential 
information and is intended solely for use by the individual to whom it is 
addressed. If you receive this correspondence in error, please notify the 
sender and delete the email from your system. Do not disclose its contents with 
others.


________________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Carson [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 7:49 AM
To: OTlist
Subject: [OTlist] Articulating the Difference Between OT and PT?

Hello:

I  frequently  find  myself articulating the difference between OT and
PT.  For  years, I've struggled understanding a clear cut line between
our profession. As such, articulating the difference was at best, very
difficult.  However,  I think I'm finally understanding a WORKABLE and
ACCURATE  description  and  what  other's  opinion. One caveat is that
there  is  overlap  between  our  professions  that  are impossible to
differentiate,  so  what  I'm  offering  is a definition that "draws a
clear line in the sand" between us. So, here it is:

        "PT FOCUSES treatment on improving acute injury or body parts.
        OT FOCUSES treatment on improving occupation"

This simple definition includes the overlapping areas but also clearly
defines a role difference between OT and PT.

What do you think....

Ron

--
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to