Dear Linda and the OTList,
I agree with your comments about therapist reluctance to work and consult with 
nursing about adaptations for showers i.e. to make them more safe and 
functionally independent. This kind of collaboration should occur and yes often 
the OT's want to stick to the gym and get done what they can down in the rehab 
area. So I feel your pain. When a patient is deemed too low level to take a 
shower it should be followed with a plan to make that possible as soon as 
possible and then put it into place...but don't avoid the matter all together 
and just focus on "strengthening". 
 
I admire all OT managers and teamates that actually concerned these quality of 
care and functional outcomes and I know that it takes a lot of leadership and 
energy to shape and mold the practices of the staff toward optimal 
occupation-based tasks. I regret that, my experience, managers are often  more 
exclusively concerned  about the number minutes your spent with the patient for 
the optimal RUGS category, and whether you filled out all the required 
paperwork for reinbursement. 
 
So THANK YOU for focusing on these types of matters, this is the kind of 
emphasis that we need to refocus our professional behavior.
 
P.S.  As a male OT I sometimes have trouble with patient showers....people 
prefer a female to be present...which sometimes means I ask a female colleague 
to switch patients or I do work with the CNA so that they know to how to 
structure the shower for optimal participation or sometimes I do delay 
addressing showers with the patient until I know that they would only need 
distant supervision and set-up to perform the task thus preserving their 
privacy and modesty...this also requires a lot of rapport building with certain 
patients. As I male I have a unique challenge in practice but I try not to use 
it as an excuse for avoiding needed intervention. 
Thanks again
Brnet Cheyne OTR/L


      
-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to