Susanne, better late than never, right? <smile>

The  patient  does  ambulate  independently,  but  the supervision was
because  of  my  comfort  level. During the eval, the patient reported
that she toilets without assistance. I did not actually evaluate this,
so I'm going on her report only. But, your point is well made.

Also, the daughter was NOT asked about her satisfaction with assisting
her  mother.  However,  she  was  involved  in  the evaluation. In all
honesty  though, even if the daughter voiced a desire to see change in
her  mother,  insurance  limitations  do  not  allow me to address the
daughter's needs, only the patients.

Good questions!

Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OT

----- Original Message -----
From: susanne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] How Would YOU Treat This Patient?

s> Hi  Ron  -  bit late reply, I know:-) But I would wonder - when she
s> needs supervision for ambulating - thus can't be REALLY independent
s> with  toileting  -  that  means she can't be alone for long, right?
s> Seems  to  me that may easily turn into an occupational problem for
s> the daughter living with her - did she get a say?

s> To me, it would also be OT to figure out a way for the daughter to
s> have a life besides caregiving.

s> Warmly

s> susanne


s> ---- Original Message ----
s> From: "Ron Carson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s> To: "Mary Alice Cafiero" <[email protected]>
s> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 4:59 AM
s> Subject: Re: [OTlist] How Would YOU Treat This Patient?

>> Thanks Chris and Mary Alice for your replies.
>> 
>> This was my last patient for the week and I elected to
>> NOT pick her up for  OT.  The  reason is simple; She
>> stated she was satisfied with her currently  occupational
>> performance  (of course, she didn't use those words
>> <smile>). 
>> 
>> I  posted  the  message because I'm wondering if other
>> OT's would have picked  her  up.  I  guess  I'm second
>> guessing my cut back to PRN and wondering if I should be
>> LESS selective in the patient's I see. 
>> 
>> I  don't  know  though.  I've  always  said  that  if a
>> patient has no identifiable  occupational  performance 
>> goals then there' no role for OT.  And  while  there may
>> be exceptions to this approach, I generally try to follow
>> it. 


s> --
s> Options?
s> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

s> Archive?
s> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to