I do not think an occupation-based approach to evaluation, treatment and 
outcomes limits the practice of OT.? I only think giving up on UE treatment in 
hand clinics and with stroke patients would debilitate the field of OT.? I have 
not disagreed on very many of your specific case studies that you have provided 
in which you have DC'd a patient from OT.? I would have probably done the same 
thing.? I primarily work in an acute rehab unit, and taking an occupation based 
approach is the only way to go when the patient's goal is to make it back 
home.? I can totally see your point of view when trying to totally get away 
from UE treatment based on a?large sample of rehab hospital/nursing home 
therapists who provide only UE "treatment" to pass time without any purpose or 
meaning.?I strongly agree that OT would be much more of a?solidified profession 
if all of the OTs?in?acute rehab, home health, and?nursing homes would take an 
occupation based approach. ?I do not think this should ruin the reputation of 
all of the hard working OTs in hand therapy and neuro clinics who provide a 
critical service to patient's with UE dysfunction.? I continue to believe that 
these therapists are OTs and they are providing OT services that impact the 
patient's personal occupations.

I hope there is a solution?for all of the therapists whom give us OTs a poor 
reputation.? I have worked with individuals like this and they more often than 
not are oblivous to the fact that what they are doing is not really OT or 
therapy at all for that matter.? Somtimes a simple talking to works, sometimes 
it doesn't.? I think one step we can take is to try to be a mentor for 
individuals whom are stuck in an OT rut.?Another step that I think would be of 
value would be more continuuing education involving OT and occupation.? There 
are so many courses out their taught by PT focusing on body 
functions/structures, it is to no wonder that?therapists are focusing primarily 
on these issues.? I think we need more on occupation, practical solutions for 
impairments from top notch green thumb therapists.?Perhaps with a?major push in 
this we would see a "trickle down effect" in the quality of care. ?Ron have you 
ever thought about taking your act on the road and teaching on the continuuing 
ed circuit?

Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 7:16 pm
Subject: [OTlist] Thoughts on Limiting Our Practice



It's  been  suggested  that a occupation-based approach to evaluation,
treatment  and  outcomes  limits the practice of OT. I want to suggest
that such an approach does just the opposite.

First,  there  is  NO profession addressing occupation. There are some
professions,  namely  PT,  SLP,  Aides,  RN, OT, that address PARTS of
occupation,  but  no  profession sees the entire picture from start to
finish.  And  because of this, many, many patients never truly achieve
their highest potential!

Second,   facilitating  occupation  is  excruciating  difficult.  But,
because  of  this,  it's  wonderfully  rewarding.  Case  in  point, is
"Martha". One of her goals is independently getting on/off the toilet.
Over  the  course  of  her treatment, Martha has been able to transfer
to/from the toilet. And she has even successfully used her OLD toilet.
I  say  "old"  because in an effort to make transfers easier, a higher
toilet  was  installed.  BUT,  the  new toilet has a different seat in
which  Martha  sinks  into.  Thus, while she can easier sit on her new
toilet,  she can not TURN while sitting to allow her to grad installed
hand rails. Thus, the new toilet seat doesn't work well. You know, who
would  think that the shape of a toilet seat is the difference between
independence  and  dependence.  So,  the  observation  skills, problem
solving,  environmental awareness, biomechanics, and even common sense
that goes into occupation-based practice is anything but limiting.

And  while occupation-based practice does exclude some practice areas,
notably  acute  injury,  there  are  many  more areas and patients who
benefit from these services.

Sorry for typos/graphos; I'm typing about as fast as I'm thinking!

Ron
-- 
Ron Carson MHS, OT


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to