Mary Catherine
I don't think I have ever replied directly to you before. I want to tell
you that I feel the same way about the lack of reaction to most of my
posts. I always value your comments and frequently feel, Oh yes, I agree
with that. Generally since I have no difference of opinion with you I'm
not questioning your comments. I know from my own experience what a
difference it would make to you to have the, "O yes I agree with you"
come up on your computer. We all seem to wind up debating with Ron or
responding to Ron rather than with each other.
I have a different thought about the timing of OT, or perhaps it is
another contributing factor. Once cognitively intact clients have had a
good start in OT methods they begin to make their own adaptations and
set their own goals. The PT then becomes a technical assistant to help
them achieve their occupational goals. So it is not our job at that
point to teach them to take care of themselves but to support them in
their own reasoning. Once again where there is a cognitive deficit this
is most unlikely to happen.

Joan Riches B.Sc.O.T., OT(C)
Specialist in Cognitive Disability
Riches Consulting
High River, Alberta, Canada
403 652 7928
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mary Alice Cafiero
Sent: February 21, 2009 4:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OTlist] The Timing of OT...


I think that patients often equate PT not only with walking, but also  
with strengthening. It seems they often feel that the majority of  
their problems doing things are because of weakness. If they can just  
get stronger, all else will fix itself. I can see this especially  
being true with a diagnosis like MS or other progressive neuromuscular  
disease.

We, as OTs, can clearly see that learning to do the things you need to  
do for yourself has inherent value. It also ends up addressing  
strengthening without doing a straight exercise program. I tend to  
think that patients often prescribe to the "no pain, no gain" theory  
and feel that they have to do multiple reps of an exercise in order to  
address weak muscles.

My two cents. I'll be curious to see if anyone responds. The majority  
of times that I post a response on this board, no one directly  
responds, and my answers just get shuffled over. Not sure of the  
reason for that, but it is certainly frustrating. Makes me reluctant  
to post because it doesn't seem to add to or lead to further discussion.

Mary Alice

Mary Alice Cafiero, MSOT/L, ATP
[email protected]
972-757-3733
Fax 888-708-8683

This message, including any attachments, may include confidential,  
privileged and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this  
communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is  
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the recipient  
of this message, please notify the sender and permanently delete the  
message from your system.





On Feb 21, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Ron Carson wrote:

> I had an interesting experience that I want to share.
>
> Last week, I evaluated a middle-aged man with muscular dystrophy. He  
> had
> recently moved back home with his parent and was started on home  
> health.
>
> The  man  essentially told me that there was nothing I could do for  
> him.
> He said that PT was all he needed. I explained that as an OT, my job  
> was
> to  teach  him  to take care of himself as much as possible and  
> desired.
> But, he still felt that PT is what he needed.
>
> I  am really perplexed as to why someone might value PT instead of  
> OT? I
> have  some  ideas,  which  I'll share, but I hope readers are  
> willing to
> discuss this situation.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron
>
> --
> Ron Carson MHS, OT
> www.OTnow.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
>
> Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.1/1962 - Release Date:
02/20/09 19:22:00



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to