Today,  I  evaluated  a home health patient. I did not know this until I
started  my eval, but the patient was previously evaluated by an OT from
my company and was being treated by a COTA.

When  I  looked  through our interdisciplinary communication log, I read
COTA  notes  that  essentially said: "UB strengthening and sit/stand from
chair"  Before  I  even  started  evaluating  the  patient,  I knew that
treatment  was bogus!!! I was so frustrated, I bet my blood pressure was
180/120!!!

This  patient was independent up until she fell and FRACTURED HER HIP!!!
My evaluation revealed that the patient was cognitively intact, was weak
in  her  bi-lateral  shoulders,  had pain in her right knee and was VERY
afraid  of  falling.  She  is  essentially  DEPENDENT  for all self-care
because she is afraid to stand/walk.

I  think  the  PT has addressed shower transfers including getting a tub
transfer bench. I don't really know the original OT's plan of treatment,
but  I  assume  I've  totally  modified  it.  Every goal I wrote for the
patient, except UB dressing, included transfers and mobility training.

I'm  telling  you, this is JUST ONE MORE SAD example of crappy OT. Or as
someone  else  said,  more  like  crappy  PT.  What  the  heck  are OT's
thinking???  Are  we  so stinkin' focused on being UE PT's that we can't
see below the shoulder and hand? Are we so locked in to our comfort zone
that we can't push patient's boundaries to allow them the opportunity to
successfully  engage  in  meaningful  occupation?  IS  THIS  HOW WE HELP
PATIENTS LIVE LIFE TO THE FULLEST???????????????????????????????????????

Sometimes  I  feel that our profession is a sham!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What a shame that OT's have such little ability to address our so called
expertise!! AARGH!!!!

P.S.  I  know this message is "over the top", and I'm obviously venting,
so please take that into consideration before slammin' me!! <smile>

Thanks,

Ron


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to