I'm going to try and answer the questions posed by Ron as an OT student in 
Canada...

1. Why do OT's treat arms and not legs?
 My understanding is that we do. 
Ambulating can be a significant facilitator to engaging in occupations. In this 
mindset, L/E therapy most definitely 
falls under the OT realm. I think a common way to split up rehab caseloads is 
U/E to OT and L/E to PT shoulders and 
elbows and hands are more immediate to engagement than legs, but really the 
division seems pretty arbitrary, and maybe just a 
convenient way to split up a caseload. 
 
 2. Aren't MOST PT's better trained to treat physical dysfunction?
 I don't know. I thought this would be clearer to both us students and the 
physios after we took and interdisciplinary class, 
but it just got more blurry. My conclusion is that as long as the client is 
getting the best and most complete care, 
from whomever that is, then that theoretically is the right professional. If an 
OT doesn't feel competent in an intervention, then 
yes, refer. OR...boost your education and skills in that area. OR...devise a 
plan where you learn from the PT or vice 
versa. I don't think it has to be a one or the other thing, even though it 
often works out that way. Also, if we refer 
based on the notion that most PT's are more competent in phys med, implying 
that not all are, then we miss the 
client-centered premise of OT, by not locating the best care.   
 
CM> 3.  Where  is  the  line  between focused treatment on an UE and focused
 
CM> treatment   on   occupation?   Can   both   co-exist   with   the   same
 
CM> patient/therapist? Yes, I think so. Occupation for many clients is 
dependent on physically interacting with the 
environment, often with hands, which are placed in that environment with 
shoulders and elbows. I think U/E focused therapy
 and occupation focussed therapy MUST co-exist. What's the point of having a 
working limb if you don't have anything to 
do with it? And what's the point of having something to do if you don't have 
the physical capabilities to do it? One
 way it was explained to me: During shoulder rehab, PTs will have their clients 
do those shoulder circles. BORING. Say
 the client had a love of painting, then the OT therapy would involve putting a 
canvas at various planes and angles. 
The client gets shoulder rehab, based on the clinical expertise of the OT in 
U/E rehab (the planes and angles and 
duration part of it) and the client engages in their occupation of painting. 
And yes, we have been told several times 
that using the cones is not really OT...
 


_________________________________________________________________
Create a cool, new character for your Windows Liveā„¢ Messenger.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9656621
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to