Ron, 
I work in an inpatient rehab facility for adults with neurological
impairments.  Usually stroke, traumatic brain injury, tumour,
demyelinating illnesses - all sorts really.  We follow an
interdisciplinary model where we don't get too caught up on professional
boundaries so that if I have a particular skill in an area I will treat
and vice versa with physios etc despite traditional roles.  For example
treatment of the upper limb is shared between physio and OT depending on
who has the skill and/or time.  Most often we both treat with the physio
doing the biomechanical things and the OT doing a more practical,
occupational based session. Saying that, our PT's are big believers in
treating using real tasks and often try and make it a bit more
functional. 

To comment on the role of OT where I work, I would say that it is to
enable my clients to achieve their occupational goals which is usually
to get back to living in the community as close to previous function as
possible. That usually entails PADL and DADL retraining, cognitive and
visual perception ax and rx, fatigue management, home environment
modifications, wheelchair and seating assessments, UL therapy, driver
assessment. We don't usually look at return to work at this stage but
have done for higher functioning clients.  

Angela 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 14:38
To: [email protected]
Subject: OTlist Digest, Vol 67, Issue 5

Send OTlist mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of OTlist digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: W/C evals (Mary Alice Cafiero)
   2. Re: Functional Therapist? (Ron Carson)
   3. Re: Dental Hygienst Knows About OT... (Ron Carson)
   4. Re: Dental Hygienst Knows About OT... (Ron Carson)
   5. Re: Dental Hygienst Knows About OT... ([email protected])
   6. Re: Dental Hygienst Knows About OT... (Ron Carson)
   7. Re: Dental Hygienst Knows About OT... ([email protected])
   8. Re: Dental Hygienst Knows About OT... (Ron Carson)
   9. Re: Dental Hygienst Knows About OT... ([email protected])


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:20:04 -0500
From: Mary Alice Cafiero <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OTlist] W/C evals
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

I don't have the actual reference close at hand. This was something I  
learned at a course when I first started billing on my own. The course  
was done by either Permobil or Pride. If you look at the list of CPT  
codes that are applicable to OT, it shows the code, the definition,  
and what it can be billed with, can't be billed with, and is suspect  
if it is billed with. I will do my best to find it later. I do know  
that it works to bill both on the same day as that is how I am getting  
reimbursed. That is Medicare. Private insurance and Medicaid are a  
totally different ballgame and vary wildly.

Juan-- If I saw a patient for only an hour (never happens), I would  
bill the eval code and then 2 or 3 units of 97542, depending on how  
much time I felt was dedicated to chair discussion/decisions only.  
Just FYI, the Medicare evaluation I use is 12 pages long and includes  
a place to justify everything that is not an included item in the base  
price of the chair. Most Medicare evals take a minimum of 1  1/2 hours  
and as long as 3, depending on the complexity and circumstances. I  
also use my eval only and don't do an additional LMN.

Good day, all.
Mary Alice

Mary Alice Cafiero, MSOT/L, ATP
[email protected]
972-757-3733
Fax 888-708-8683

This message, including any attachments, may include confidential,  
privileged and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this  
communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is  
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the recipient  
of this message, please notify the sender and permanently delete the  
message from your system.





On Jun 11, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Ron Carson wrote:

> Good conversation.
>
> Mary, will you provide a reference for this statement:
>
>>> It  is  also  true  that the 97542 wheelchair management and
>        training  code is the only code that can be billed for  
> treatment
>        on the same day the MAC evaluation code is used. <<
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mary Alice Cafiero <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009
> To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subj: [OTlist] W/C evals
>
> MAC> It is also true that the 97542 wheelchair management and  
> training code
> MAC> is the only code that can be billed for treatment on the same  
> day the
> MAC> evaluation code is used. This makes it possible to do the OT  
> eval/
> MAC> Whelchair assessment on the same day. I procure the doctor's  
> order for
> MAC> eval and tx ahead of time.
> MAC> It's all a work in progress on my part because it is a very new  
> field
> MAC> to be doing only w/c evals in patients' homes but not as part  
> of a
> MAC> home health agency. Believe me, it confounds all of the funding
> MAC> sources when I call with ?S.
> MAC> Sure is fun, though!
>
> MAC> Your explanation of the 7 minute rule is what I understood.....  
> but it
> MAC> needs to be clear that an hour long treatment is 4 units, not 8  
> units
> MAC> (as it would be if it were a true "per 7 minute unit").
>
>
> MAC> Mary Alice
>
> MAC> Mary Alice Cafiero, MSOT/L, ATP
> MAC> [email protected]
> MAC> 972-757-3733
> MAC> Fax 888-708-8683
>
>
>
>
> --
> Options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
>
> Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:08:57 -0400
From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Functional Therapist?
To: "Angela King (ADHB)" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

Angela, will you comment on the role of OT where you work?

Thanks,

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Angela King (ADHB) <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Functional Therapist?

AKA> I really don't get this issue very much in my place of work and
that is
AKA> because all members of our team have good understanding and great
AKA> respect for the role of OT so the client gets it from all corners.
We
AKA> also provide written information explaining the role of each member
of
AKA> the team. 




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:10:54 -0400
From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...
To: Miranda Hayek <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Miranda,  to  me what you describe is NOT occupational therapy. I see it
more as PT.

Sorry, I know that statement won't be well received.

Thanks,

Ron

----- Original Message -----
From: Miranda Hayek <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...


MH> I agree with Kristin. I work in outpatient and treat many UE
MH> injuries. Although I do manual therapy, exercises, etc....I also
MH> discuss during each session how their occupations are affected, what
MH> is becoming easier, how we can modify current occupations to be more
MH> successful, and ways to incorporate use of UE into functional
MH> activities to be get more use. So I think we should be continue to
have this specialty!


MH> ~ Miranda ~ 




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:04:46 -0400
From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...
To: Kristin <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Kristin, I don't really know where to start, so let me just jump in.

In  my  opinion, the BIGGEST problem facing OT is that we do not do what
we  say  we do. Comparing AOTA's rhetoric and practice patterns of adult
phys  dys  OT's  does  not  paint  a congruent picture. On paper, the OT
profession  is  all about occupation. In practice, adult phys dys is all
about UE rehab. For me, this inconsistency is killing our profession!

I'm going to disagree with some of what you've written:

 1) A broken finger may or may not cause occupational deficits. And even
 if  it does, these deficits may not require the skill of an OT.

 2) I don't care if the hygienist had a good or bad experience. I do
care
 if the experience revolved around occupation.

 3)  Occupation  should  NOT be things talked about during rote therapy.
 Occupation should be the FOCUS and outcome of treatment.

 4) The profession needs therapists who are experts in occupation. Leave
 the UE specialization to PT.

Disclaimer:

        My  comments  are  not  directed towards YOU. They are just
        general comments about how I feel towards OT.

        Everyone  is  welcome  to  join  this conversation. Only through
        honest  and  logical  dialogue  will  we  better  understand and
        appreciate everyone's viewpoints.

Thanks,

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com



----- Original Message -----
From: Kristin <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...


K> I guess I dont understand why it's such a horrible thing for OT's to
K> be knowledgeable and profiecient in treating UE ailments. I agree
K> that shouldn't be the only area for the profession to focus on, but
K> having a broken finger causes dysfunctional occupational performance!
K> At least the dental hygenist had a good experience with OT as opposed
K> to the 'cone therapists'. I would be interested to hear if the
K> therapist discussed what the patient could do at home to reduce pain
K> and improve function. The things we should be talking about when
K> performing more rote therapy techniques. 
K> I think the profession needs OT's who are UE specialists! We don't
K> want to loose that specialty area! 

K> Kristin





------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:07:44 -0400
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

I see the horse is not dead yet!!!!

This age old debate revolves around the top down approach and the 
bottom up approach to treatment, or the occupation as a means or an 
end.  We as OTs in physical disabilities can choose either to treat 
occupational dysfunction in two ways a) Use occupations as the 
treatment modality to combat the issue of occupational dysfunction 
either through restoration or compensation or b) Treat the underlying 
impairment.  In my opinion it simply depends on what is causing the 
occupational dysfunction.  If an occupational takes an interest in hand 
therapy and they decide to specialize in this area (PTs can do this 
too) then I would say that the occupational therapist is doing hand 
therapy.  I would not state that they are doing physical therapy 
because this is a gray area.  Perhaps a physical therapist takes an 
interest in visual perceptual training ( my PT friend did) because of 
their strong background in neurorehabilitation.  When they utilize this 
training during treatment sessions to facilitate better outcomes with 
gait and balance, would they state that they are doing occupational 
therapy? What if a PT takes a liking to driving evals and training 
(IADL),. Would they call it occupational therapy or drivers training?

What Ron is simply trying to do is change the paradigm of occupatonal 
therapy and simply rewrite the textbooks we once read in school, by 
erasing the biomechanical model.  I applaud him to a certain extent, 
but at times I an confused by his reasoning.

Hand Therapy does not necessarily mean a cone or peg pusher therapist.  
A Hand therapist does not necessarily give the pubilic a certain image 
of what OT is , but it is the misguided therapist that provides OT 
without meaning in order complete enough time to reach a certain RUG 
level or complete the "Three hour rule".  I do not think it is Ron's 
intent to upset all of the OTs who practice hand therapy, but to guide 
phys dys OTs to provide meaning during their therapy sessions in order 
to clean up the public perception of what we do.

Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR..

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
To: Kristin <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:04 pm
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

Kristin, I don't really know where to start, so let me just jump in.

In  my  opinion, the BIGGEST problem facing OT is that we do not do what
we  say  we do. Comparing AOTA's rhetoric and practice patterns of adult
phys  dys  OT's  does  not  paint  a congruent picture. On paper, the OT
profession  is  all about occupation. In practice, adult phys dys is all
about UE rehab. For me, this inconsistency is killing our profession!

I'm going to disagree with some of what you've written:

 1) A broken finger may or may not cause occupational deficits. And even
 if  it does, these deficits may not require the skill of an OT.

  2) I don't care if the hygienist had a good or bad experience. I do 
care
 if the experience revolved around occupation.

 3)  Occupation  should  NOT be things talked about during rote therapy.
 Occupation should be the FOCUS and outcome of treatment.

 4) The profession needs therapists who are experts in occupation. Leave
 the UE specialization to PT.

Disclaimer:

        My  comments  are  not  directed towards YOU. They are just
        general comments about how I feel towards OT.

        Everyone  is  welcome  to  join  this conversation. Only through
        honest  and  logical  dialogue  will  we  better  understand and
        appreciate everyone's viewpoints.

Thanks,

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com



----- Original Message -----
From: Kristin <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...


K> I guess I dont understand why it's such a horrible thing for OT's to
K> be knowledgeable and profiecient in treating UE ailments. I agree
K> that shouldn't be the only area for the profession to focus on, but
K> having a broken finger causes dysfunctional occupational performance!
K> At least the dental hygenist had a good experience with OT as opposed
K> to the 'cone therapists'. I would be interested to hear if the
K> therapist discussed what the patient could do at home to reduce pain
K> and improve function. The things we should be talking about when
K> performing more rote therapy techniques.
K> I think the profession needs OT's who are UE specialists! We don't
K> want to loose that specialty area!

K> Kristin



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]





------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:07:34 -0400
From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

Hello All:

Chris, so of what you say is correct, but much isn't.

I  am 100% for treating physical disabilities as they impair occupation.
However, my experience is that MOST (almost 100% is my guess) ONLY TREAT
the UE as it relates to occupation. That to me is WRONG for patients and
wrong for our profession.

I  agree that "true" hand therapy is a gray area and as you mention, can
be  done  by  OT  or  PT. In these cases I prefer to think the person is
doing  hand  therapy,  not OT or PT. At some point, any professional can
move  so  far  away from their practice paradigm that they are no longer
practicing their profession. This is almost never a clear cut line.

However,  hand therapy is not a real concern for me. What does bother me
is  that  most OT's who I know that work in adult phys dys practice like
hand  therapists,  but without the advanced skills. In my experience, OT
is  known as UE hand therapy. Almost EVERY experience that people relate
to  me  about  OT  is  hand/UE  related. I almost NEVER hear about an OT
giving people back their lives, or restoring occupation, etc.

In my opinion, despite a significant change in AOTA's literature, almost
nothing  has  changed in adult phys dys practice. Today, OT use the word
occupation,  but  that's about it. They don't really practice occupation
based  therapy because if they did, most of them would not be focused on
the UE.

In  my  home  health  company,  I  refuse  to treat UE injury UNLESS the
patient  is  FOCUSED  ON  IMPROVING  OCCUPATION. Initially this caused a
significant  rift  for  my employer but they have accepted it and worked
around  it  by referring such patients to other OT's. But, this does not
mean  I  don't treat PEOPLE with UE injury. In fact, I just d/c'd such a
person.

It is my SINCERE (and I mean SINCERE) desire to see the profession of OT
embrace occupation. I will continue beating this "horse" until I give up
or  die. And I mean that with all my heart.


----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

cac> I see the horse is not dead yet!!!!

cac> This age old debate revolves around the top down approach and the 
cac> bottom up approach to treatment, or the occupation as a means or an

cac> end.  We as OTs in physical disabilities can choose either to treat

cac> occupational dysfunction in two ways a) Use occupations as the 
cac> treatment modality to combat the issue of occupational dysfunction 
cac> either through restoration or compensation or b) Treat the
underlying 
cac> impairment.  In my opinion it simply depends on what is causing the

cac> occupational dysfunction.  If an occupational takes an interest in
hand 
cac> therapy and they decide to specialize in this area (PTs can do this

cac> too) then I would say that the occupational therapist is doing hand

cac> therapy.  I would not state that they are doing physical therapy 
cac> because this is a gray area.  Perhaps a physical therapist takes an

cac> interest in visual perceptual training ( my PT friend did) because
of 
cac> their strong background in neurorehabilitation.  When they utilize
this 
cac> training during treatment sessions to facilitate better outcomes
with 
cac> gait and balance, would they state that they are doing occupational

cac> therapy? What if a PT takes a liking to driving evals and training 
cac> (IADL),. Would they call it occupational therapy or drivers
training?

cac> What Ron is simply trying to do is change the paradigm of
occupatonal 
cac> therapy and simply rewrite the textbooks we once read in school, by

cac> erasing the biomechanical model.  I applaud him to a certain
extent, 
cac> but at times I an confused by his reasoning.

cac> Hand Therapy does not necessarily mean a cone or peg pusher
therapist.  
cac> A Hand therapist does not necessarily give the pubilic a certain
image 
cac> of what OT is , but it is the misguided therapist that provides OT 
cac> without meaning in order complete enough time to reach a certain
RUG 
cac> level or complete the "Three hour rule".  I do not think it is
Ron's 
cac> intent to upset all of the OTs who practice hand therapy, but to
guide 
cac> phys dys OTs to provide meaning during their therapy sessions in
order 
cac> to clean up the public perception of what we do.

cac> Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR..





------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:51:44 -0400
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Ron,

Not sure where the disagreement is found "Chris, so of what you say is 
correct, but much isn't"

So it is ok to step out of your traditional role as an OT to complete 
lymphedma treatment, but it is not ok to step out of the traditional 
role as an OT to complete UE orthopedic treatment?  Seems to me you are 
on both sides of the fence, but for some reason you cannot stand UE 
impairment based treatment.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, Jun 13, 2009 3:07 pm
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

Hello All:

Chris, so of what you say is correct, but much isn't.

I  am 100% for treating physical disabilities as they impair occupation.
However, my experience is that MOST (almost 100% is my guess) ONLY TREAT
the UE as it relates to occupation. That to me is WRONG for patients and
wrong for our profession.

I  agree that "true" hand therapy is a gray area and as you mention, can
be  done  by  OT  or  PT. In these cases I prefer to think the person is
doing  hand  therapy,  not OT or PT. At some point, any professional can
move  so  far  away from their practice paradigm that they are no longer
practicing their profession. This is almost never a clear cut line.

However,  hand therapy is not a real concern for me. What does bother me
is  that  most OT's who I know that work in adult phys dys practice like
hand  therapists,  but without the advanced skills. In my experience, OT
is  known as UE hand therapy. Almost EVERY experience that people relate
to  me  about  OT  is  hand/UE  related. I almost NEVER hear about an OT
giving people back their lives, or restoring occupation, etc.

In my opinion, despite a significant change in AOTA's literature, almost
nothing  has  changed in adult phys dys practice. Today, OT use the word
occupation,  but  that's about it. They don't really practice occupation
based  therapy because if they did, most of them would not be focused on
the UE.

In  my  home  health  company,  I  refuse  to treat UE injury UNLESS the
patient  is  FOCUSED  ON  IMPROVING  OCCUPATION. Initially this caused a
significant  rift  for  my employer but they have accepted it and worked
around  it  by referring such patients to other OT's. But, this does not
mean  I  don't treat PEOPLE with UE injury. In fact, I just d/c'd such a
person.

It is my SINCERE (and I mean SINCERE) desire to see the profession of OT
embrace occupation. I will continue beating this "horse" until I give up
or  die. And I mean that with all my heart.


----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

cac> I see the horse is not dead yet!!!!

cac> This age old debate revolves around the top down approach and the
cac> bottom up approach to treatment, or the occupation as a means or 
an
cac> end.  We as OTs in physical disabilities can choose either to 
treat
cac> occupational dysfunction in two ways a) Use occupations as the
cac> treatment modality to combat the issue of occupational dysfunction
cac> either through restoration or compensation or b) Treat the 
underlying
cac> impairment.  In my opinion it simply depends on what is causing 
the
cac> occupational dysfunction.  If an occupational takes an interest in 
hand
cac> therapy and they decide to specialize in this area (PTs can do 
this
cac> too) then I would say that the occupational therapist is doing 
hand
cac> therapy.  I would not state that they are doing physical therapy
cac> because this is a gray area.  Perhaps a physical therapist takes 
an
cac> interest in visual perceptual training ( my PT friend did) because 
of
cac> their strong background in neurorehabilitation.  When they utilize 
this
cac> training during treatment sessions to facilitate better outcomes 
with
cac> gait and balance, would they state that they are doing 
occupational
cac> therapy? What if a PT takes a liking to driving evals and training
cac> (IADL),. Would they call it occupational therapy or drivers 
training?

cac> What Ron is simply trying to do is change the paradigm of 
occupatonal
cac> therapy and simply rewrite the textbooks we once read in school, 
by
cac> erasing the biomechanical model.  I applaud him to a certain 
extent,
cac> but at times I an confused by his reasoning.

cac> Hand Therapy does not necessarily mean a cone or peg pusher 
therapist.
cac> A Hand therapist does not necessarily give the pubilic a certain 
image
cac> of what OT is , but it is the misguided therapist that provides OT
cac> without meaning in order complete enough time to reach a certain 
RUG
cac> level or complete the "Three hour rule".  I do not think it is 
Ron's
cac> intent to upset all of the OTs who practice hand therapy, but to 
guide
cac> phys dys OTs to provide meaning during their therapy sessions in 
order
cac> to clean up the public perception of what we do.

cac> Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR..



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]





------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:41:52 -0400
From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

Chris, I do not feel like I'm straddling the fence. When I do lymphedema
treatment,  that  is  EXACTLY  what I'm doing. I am NOT doing OT. I feel
that  same  about  hand therapy, driver training, etc. These specialized
roles  (especially ones that are discipline independent (e.g.
lymphedema,
hand therapy) are so far removed from mainstream OT that they should not
be referred to as OT.

I  have  NO  problem  with  OT's doing UE therapy, but that is what they
should call it. My problem is that the vast majority of OT's that I know
practice neither impairment-based nor occupation-based therapy. Instead,
they practice an amalgam of both which is really just "mush".

I  ask  my  patients  if  they had OT before seeing me. The majority say
"yes".  I  ask  them  what  the  OT  did.  The VAST majority indicate UE
function.  I  ask them if is was effective in helping reach their goals.
The  majority  just  sort  of  "shrug"  and  roll their eyes. THIS IS MY
EXPERIENCE about OT.

It  is  my  opinion  that  the  MAJORITY  of people having knowledge and
interaction with adult phys dys OT think one of two things:

1. It's UE PT

2. It's a waste of time.

Neither  of  these  are acceptable to me. I want people to see OT as the
profession that restored their lives.

Thanks,

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com



----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

cac> Ron,

cac> Not sure where the disagreement is found "Chris, so of what you say
is 
cac> correct, but much isn't"

cac> So it is ok to step out of your traditional role as an OT to
complete 
cac> lymphedma treatment, but it is not ok to step out of the
traditional 
cac> role as an OT to complete UE orthopedic treatment?  Seems to me you
are 
cac> on both sides of the fence, but for some reason you cannot stand UE

cac> impairment based treatment.

cac> Chris

cac> -----Original Message-----
cac> From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
cac> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
cac> Sent: Sat, Jun 13, 2009 3:07 pm
cac> Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

cac> Hello All:

cac> Chris, so of what you say is correct, but much isn't.

cac> I  am 100% for treating physical disabilities as they impair
occupation.
cac> However, my experience is that MOST (almost 100% is my guess) ONLY
TREAT
cac> the UE as it relates to occupation. That to me is WRONG for
patients and
cac> wrong for our profession.

cac> I  agree that "true" hand therapy is a gray area and as you
mention, can
cac> be  done  by  OT  or  PT. In these cases I prefer to think the
person is
cac> doing  hand  therapy,  not OT or PT. At some point, any
professional can
cac> move  so  far  away from their practice paradigm that they are no
longer
cac> practicing their profession. This is almost never a clear cut line.

cac> However,  hand therapy is not a real concern for me. What does
bother me
cac> is  that  most OT's who I know that work in adult phys dys practice
like
cac> hand  therapists,  but without the advanced skills. In my
experience, OT
cac> is  known as UE hand therapy. Almost EVERY experience that people
relate
cac> to  me  about  OT  is  hand/UE  related. I almost NEVER hear about
an OT
cac> giving people back their lives, or restoring occupation, etc.

cac> In my opinion, despite a significant change in AOTA's literature,
almost
cac> nothing  has  changed in adult phys dys practice. Today, OT use the
word
cac> occupation,  but  that's about it. They don't really practice
occupation
cac> based  therapy because if they did, most of them would not be
focused on
cac> the UE.

cac> In  my  home  health  company,  I  refuse  to treat UE injury
UNLESS the
cac> patient  is  FOCUSED  ON  IMPROVING  OCCUPATION. Initially this
caused a
cac> significant  rift  for  my employer but they have accepted it and
worked
cac> around  it  by referring such patients to other OT's. But, this
does not
cac> mean  I  don't treat PEOPLE with UE injury. In fact, I just d/c'd
such a
cac> person.

cac> It is my SINCERE (and I mean SINCERE) desire to see the profession
of OT
cac> embrace occupation. I will continue beating this "horse" until I
give up
cac> or  die. And I mean that with all my heart.


cac> ----- Original Message -----
cac> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
cac> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009
cac> To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
cac> Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

cac>> I see the horse is not dead yet!!!!

cac>> This age old debate revolves around the top down approach and the
cac>> bottom up approach to treatment, or the occupation as a means or 
cac> an
cac>> end.  We as OTs in physical disabilities can choose either to 
cac> treat
cac>> occupational dysfunction in two ways a) Use occupations as the
cac>> treatment modality to combat the issue of occupational dysfunction
cac>> either through restoration or compensation or b) Treat the 
cac> underlying
cac>> impairment.  In my opinion it simply depends on what is causing 
cac> the
cac>> occupational dysfunction.  If an occupational takes an interest in

cac> hand
cac>> therapy and they decide to specialize in this area (PTs can do 
cac> this
cac>> too) then I would say that the occupational therapist is doing 
cac> hand
cac>> therapy.  I would not state that they are doing physical therapy
cac>> because this is a gray area.  Perhaps a physical therapist takes 
cac> an
cac>> interest in visual perceptual training ( my PT friend did) because

cac> of
cac>> their strong background in neurorehabilitation.  When they utilize

cac> this
cac>> training during treatment sessions to facilitate better outcomes 
cac> with
cac>> gait and balance, would they state that they are doing 
cac> occupational
cac>> therapy? What if a PT takes a liking to driving evals and training
cac>> (IADL),. Would they call it occupational therapy or drivers 
cac> training?

cac>> What Ron is simply trying to do is change the paradigm of 
cac> occupatonal
cac>> therapy and simply rewrite the textbooks we once read in school, 
cac> by
cac>> erasing the biomechanical model.  I applaud him to a certain 
cac> extent,
cac>> but at times I an confused by his reasoning.

cac>> Hand Therapy does not necessarily mean a cone or peg pusher 
cac> therapist.
cac>> A Hand therapist does not necessarily give the pubilic a certain 
cac> image
cac>> of what OT is , but it is the misguided therapist that provides OT
cac>> without meaning in order complete enough time to reach a certain 
cac> RUG
cac>> level or complete the "Three hour rule".  I do not think it is 
cac> Ron's
cac>> intent to upset all of the OTs who practice hand therapy, but to 
cac> guide
cac>> phys dys OTs to provide meaning during their therapy sessions in 
cac> order
cac>> to clean up the public perception of what we do.

cac>> Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR..



cac> --
cac> Options?
cac> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

cac> Archive?
cac> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



cac> --
cac> Options?
cac> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

cac> Archive?
cac> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]




------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:37:43 -0400
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Ron,

I agree with with 95% of what you are saying the only things that I 
disagree with are:  I concede that it is not occupational therapy, but 
we should not call it PT either.  Gray area of practice.

1.  It is not UE PT.  It is UE therapy.  I concede that it is not 
occupational therapy, but we should not call it PT either.  Gray area 
of practice.

2.  It is not always a waste of time, but I agree that most of the time 
for most clinicians it is a waste of time.  It is only meaningful if 
the therapist knows what they are doing and only does it when there is 
an impairment, and not to fill time.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Jun 14, 2009 5:41 am
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

Chris, I do not feel like I'm straddling the fence. When I do lymphedema
treatment,  that  is  EXACTLY  what I'm doing. I am NOT doing OT. I feel
that  same  about  hand therapy, driver training, etc. These specialized
roles  (especially ones that are discipline independent (e.g. 
lymphedema,
hand therapy) are so far removed from mainstream OT that they should not
be referred to as OT.

I  have  NO  problem  with  OT's doing UE therapy, but that is what they
should call it. My problem is that the vast majority of OT's that I know
practice neither impairment-based nor occupation-based therapy. Instead,
they practice an amalgam of both which is really just "mush".

I  ask  my  patients  if  they had OT before seeing me. The majority say
"yes".  I  ask  them  what  the  OT  did.  The VAST majority indicate UE
function.  I  ask them if is was effective in helping reach their goals.
The  majority  just  sort  of  "shrug"  and  roll their eyes. THIS IS MY
EXPERIENCE about OT.

It  is  my  opinion  that  the  MAJORITY  of people having knowledge and
interaction with adult phys dys OT think one of two things:

1. It's UE PT

2. It's a waste of time.

Neither  of  these  are acceptable to me. I want people to see OT as the
profession that restored their lives.

Thanks,

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com



----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

cac> Ron,

cac> Not sure where the disagreement is found "Chris, so of what you 
say is
cac> correct, but much isn't"

cac> So it is ok to step out of your traditional role as an OT to 
complete
cac> lymphedma treatment, but it is not ok to step out of the 
traditional
cac> role as an OT to complete UE orthopedic treatment?  Seems to me 
you are
cac> on both sides of the fence, but for some reason you cannot stand 
UE
cac> impairment based treatment.

cac> Chris

cac> -----Original Message-----
cac> From: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
cac> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
cac> Sent: Sat, Jun 13, 2009 3:07 pm
cac> Subject: Re: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

cac> Hello All:

cac> Chris, so of what you say is correct, but much isn't.

cac> I  am 100% for treating physical disabilities as they impair 
occupation.
cac> However, my experience is that MOST (almost 100% is my guess) ONLY 
TREAT
cac> the UE as it relates to occupation. That to me is WRONG for 
patients and
cac> wrong for our profession.

cac> I  agree that "true" hand therapy is a gray area and as you 
mention, can
cac> be  done  by  OT  or  PT. In these cases I prefer to think the 
person is
cac> doing  hand  therapy,  not OT or PT. At some point, any 
professional can
cac> move  so  far  away from their practice paradigm that they are no 
longer
cac> practicing their profession. This is almost never a clear cut line.

cac> However,  hand therapy is not a real concern for me. What does 
bother me
cac> is  that  most OT's who I know that work in adult phys dys 
practice like
cac> hand  therapists,  but without the advanced skills. In my 
experience, OT
cac> is  known as UE hand therapy. Almost EVERY experience that people 
relate
cac> to  me  about  OT  is  hand/UE  related. I almost NEVER hear about 
an OT
cac> giving people back their lives, or restoring occupation, etc.

cac> In my opinion, despite a significant change in AOTA's literature, 
almost
cac> nothing  has  changed in adult phys dys practice. Today, OT use 
the word
cac> occupation,  but  that's about it. They don't really practice 
occupation
cac> based  therapy because if they did, most of them would not be 
focused on
cac> the UE.

cac> In  my  home  health  company,  I  refuse  to treat UE injury 
UNLESS the
cac> patient  is  FOCUSED  ON  IMPROVING  OCCUPATION. Initially this 
caused a
cac> significant  rift  for  my employer but they have accepted it and 
worked
cac> around  it  by referring such patients to other OT's. But, this 
does not
cac> mean  I  don't treat PEOPLE with UE injury. In fact, I just d/c'd 
such a
cac> person.

cac> It is my SINCERE (and I mean SINCERE) desire to see the profession 
of OT
cac> embrace occupation. I will continue beating this "horse" until I 
give up
cac> or  die. And I mean that with all my heart.


cac> ----- Original Message -----
cac> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
cac> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009
cac> To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
cac> Subj: [OTlist] Dental Hygienst Knows About OT...

cac>> I see the horse is not dead yet!!!!

cac>> This age old debate revolves around the top down approach and the
cac>> bottom up approach to treatment, or the occupation as a means or
cac> an
cac>> end.  We as OTs in physical disabilities can choose either to
cac> treat
cac>> occupational dysfunction in two ways a) Use occupations as the
cac>> treatment modality to combat the issue of occupational dysfunction
cac>> either through restoration or compensation or b) Treat the
cac> underlying
cac>> impairment.  In my opinion it simply depends on what is causing
cac> the
cac>> occupational dysfunction.  If an occupational takes an interest 
in
cac> hand
cac>> therapy and they decide to specialize in this area (PTs can do
cac> this
cac>> too) then I would say that the occupational therapist is doing
cac> hand
cac>> therapy.  I would not state that they are doing physical therapy
cac>> because this is a gray area.  Perhaps a physical therapist takes
cac> an
cac>> interest in visual perceptual training ( my PT friend did) 
because
cac> of
cac>> their strong background in neurorehabilitation.  When they 
utilize
cac> this
cac>> training during treatment sessions to facilitate better outcomes
cac> with
cac>> gait and balance, would they state that they are doing
cac> occupational
cac>> therapy? What if a PT takes a liking to driving evals and training
cac>> (IADL),. Would they call it occupational therapy or drivers
cac> training?

cac>> What Ron is simply trying to do is change the paradigm of
cac> occupatonal
cac>> therapy and simply rewrite the textbooks we once read in school,
cac> by
cac>> erasing the biomechanical model.  I applaud him to a certain
cac> extent,
cac>> but at times I an confused by his reasoning.

cac>> Hand Therapy does not necessarily mean a cone or peg pusher
cac> therapist.
cac>> A Hand therapist does not necessarily give the pubilic a certain
cac> image
cac>> of what OT is , but it is the misguided therapist that provides OT
cac>> without meaning in order complete enough time to reach a certain
cac> RUG
cac>> level or complete the "Three hour rule".  I do not think it is
cac> Ron's
cac>> intent to upset all of the OTs who practice hand therapy, but to
cac> guide
cac>> phys dys OTs to provide meaning during their therapy sessions in
cac> order
cac>> to clean up the public perception of what we do.

cac>> Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR..



cac> --
cac> Options?
cac> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

cac> Archive?
cac> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



cac> --
cac> Options?
cac> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

cac> Archive?
cac> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]





------------------------------

--
Unsubscribe?
  [email protected]

Change options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Help?
  [email protected]



End of OTlist Digest, Vol 67, Issue 5
*************************************

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to