Someone  said  something about seeing the "whole" persons. While I think
that  the  concept  of  being  holistic  or  seeing the whole person are
"nice",  they  are not truly possible. 1st off, we can only see what the
patient reveals, which may or may not be their wholeness. None the less,
I  want  to  quickly  write  about  a current patient that MAY represent
trying to see the whole person.

This  young  woman has multiple medical issues, including CVA, IDDM, s/p
kidney  transplat w/ dialysis. When I first met her, she was essentially
w/c  bound.  A few months later, in fact yesterday, she ambulated to the
kitchen to get her OT a glass of water, and did a small load of laundry.

PT has been involved in this case but only minimally. In fact, they were
put on hold for two weeks and they currently see the patient 1x/week. OT
is on the case 5x/week.

>From the beginning, OT worked on following:

1. Standing, sit/stand, functional mobility w/ RW, cane and w/o an AD.

2.   Bed  mobility,  bed  transfers,  toilet  transfers,  dressing,  car
transfers

3.  Insulin injections (more verbal prompting than teaching), meal prep,
laundry, etc.

Yesterday,  it  was  obivious that the patients dominant UE was limiting
her  occupation equally as much as her LE, balance, endurance, and fear.
So, I asked the patient if she wanted me to address her arm dysfunction.
She  said yes. In the past, I told the patient, that her arm was not the
greatest  limitation  to  her  goals.  But,  as her other body functions
increase, her arm is becoming a limitation. All along, I have instructed
the  patient  to use her affected arm and I even discussed CIMT that her
caregiver  could try. So, it's not that her arm has not be addressed, it
just  hasn't been a focus of treatment. But, starting next week, I think
I will increase treatment on her extremity.

Now,  to  me,  this  is  the  way OT should be. We should help patient's
identify  occupation goals, determine limiting factors, prioritize these
factors,  then get to work on correcting or working around these issues.
To  me, it makes no difference if it's a LE, UE, cognition, environment,
adatipive  device. If it's within my scope of practice, I try my hardest
to address the issues preventing occupational success.

To  me,  this  is  the  best  that I can do to treat the "whole person",
whatever that is! <smile>

Thanks,

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to