Votre message daté du 5-Feb-2005 10:26:12 +0100 : Hello Kervin, Luca, Charles and list
>In a mailing list I don't usually even need to know the address of the >original sender: it's an open place where everybody talks to everybody, >a "subscription newsgroup over email". Actually I think it’s better if your email is not public, it can event help to prevent spam robots to complete their data base.. >It is nowadays a standard configuration for a mailing list to mangle >reply-to, and users generally expect it. Demonstration is that me and >others have mistakefully replied to senders only, not including the ML. It was exactly my point. >…. >Moreover, if I "reply to all", as I'm doing now, I think you, Charles >and Philippe will receive two copies of the message, which is annoying. >I usually have to "reply to all", then remove all non-ML addresses >before sending, change ML address from CC to TO and then send. I second this.. Anyway all this is not that important and was just a suggestion, I hope the first troll of the list won’t start because of one of my posts. Philippe PS I cut parts of Luca's mail cause posting from a web mail. Sorry if it's not a good practise. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ otlkcon-devel mailing list otlkcon-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/otlkcon-devel
