On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:24:17PM -0500, David Goulet wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I came across an unexpected behavior that can be due to my bad > understanding or a potential bug so I need help on this one. > > The Fingerprint struct contains this: > > struct context *context; /* The context to which we belong */ > > Of what I can understand, for a given context pointer (ConnContext > *ctx), this is suppose to be equal: > > ctx == ctx->active_fingerprint->context > > I found out that this is not exactly true. In the "gone_secure" > callback, the context is passed as an argument but the above > supposition is not true i.e. the active_fingerprint->context is NOT > the same as the argument context but still a valid ConnContext pointer. > > The issue here is if someone is trying to look the OtrlMessageState > using the active fingerprint context, it's set to > OTRL_MSGSTATE_PLAINTEXT but the gone_secure context is of course set > to encrypted. > > So, am I missing something here ? > > I can confirm this with the pidgin-otr plugin and the code I'm doing > as well. > > Thanks a lot people! > David
David, Is the issue that active_fingerprint->context is pointing to the master context? (i.e. is ctx->m_context == ctx->active_fingerprint->context ?) If not, can you tell where it is pointing? Thanks, - Ian _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
