On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:40 PM, "Daniel ".koolfy" Faucon" <koo...@koolfy.be> wrote: > What a clean log management across OTR implementation does, is minimize > the frequency at which this assumption is true. Without altering the > user's perception of the "logging state" of the other interlocutor. > > The last thing we want is out encryption protocol being deceptive about > the state of the exchange. This is when everything starts to fall > apart :(
All you'd achieve there is moving the misrepresentation there back a step— about OTR in total instead of 'no logs mode'— and make it even less true (because while I'd not modify a no-logs mode, I'd certainly modify it as a blanket 'feature') and at the same time cause other people to avoid using OTR. This is not a victory. _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
