On 11/09/13 10:42, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > Does this apply to /me in other protocols, or only IRC? Ian seemed to > imply that it was only IRC, but XMPP has support for /me too. >
Don't quote me on this, but I *think* it might be that originally, IRC prpl was written with hard coded /me (did AIM have a /me?). As more prpls came along, certain / commands should've been totally abstracted out. Maybe that wasn't done/finished etc. thus leaving some spots in the IRC prpl with legacy crud. As I say, don't quote me. But I just wouldn't be surprised if this is an accurate description of what lead to the code being like it is and the behaviour as observed. Pete. _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev