So far, resounding silence on this, so I'll try again! We (Guardian Project/ChatSecure) are currently working on nailing down the final API of our DATA_RESPONSE and DATA_REQUEST TLVs for in-band data transfer. We have it implemented now in otr4j and OTRKit, its been integrated in ChatSecure-android for 6+ months, and now we are pushing forward getting this integrated into more apps.
We have been using the TLV numbers 100 and 101 to make sure that we don't conflict with anything that might be in the works. I think now is the time to make an official number so that new apps do not need to handle a migration from the temp numbers. What do we need to officially claim TLV numbers in the OTR protocol? How about 9 and 10? Should I submit a patch to libotr? Once we get it nailed down, the OTRKit code can be ported to libotr, since OTRKit is really a wrapper of libotr. Here is some more discussion, for those who want to know more details: https://github.com/jitsi/otr4j/issues/16 And OTRKit's implementation: https://github.com/ChatSecure/OTRKit/blob/otrdata/OTRKit/OTRData .hc -- PGP fingerprint: 5E61 C878 0F86 295C E17D 8677 9F0F E587 374B BE81 https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x9F0FE587374BBE81
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
