Ola Bini: > Take it as you want - this is not official in any way - although we > hope it will be official once we people have looked it over and given > thoughts and comments about the work.
Thanks for your work! I agree with Paul here, using "OTRv4" for protocol name that is not actually an OTR one is a bit confusing. If you have plans for "merging" this spec upstream it's better to go under some temporal codename for it. It will prevent situations like "Do you mean OTRv4 by STRIKE or official one?"/"I read official specs and going to use OTRv4 implementation by STRIKE team in my project"/etc. -- Ivan Markin _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
