On 3/17/18, Carsten Mattner <carstenmatt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/17/18, Carsten Mattner <carstenmatt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I feel like libsodium-dev should be the only one a v4 libotr
>
> Ideally s2n's set of ciphers would suffice and we would use
> a formally verified library, which is super useful for
> OTR's goals.
>
> Just throwing these ideas out there since v4 is still in
> design/development mode.

Forget s2n, it's a slimmed down implementation, focusing on
mainstream ciphers only. Missing everything, basically.
_______________________________________________
OTR-dev mailing list
OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca
http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev

Reply via email to