On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Jurre van Bergen wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/19/2018 04:47 PM, Danny van Heumen wrote: > >* I would be interested to hear if any other implementors are willing to > >set up a basic "test runner" that could set up otr testclients (in > >various languages) to chat with each other, as way to do interop > >testing. I've been thinking about this for a while but never got to > >actually implementing it. It might be an interesting way to do interop > >testing between Java, C and Go (etc.) libraries. > > We've been thinking about this at otr.im for a while but never got to it, > i'm interested in helping out in this particular area! > >* Last I've seen, it wasn't explicitly stated whether or not OTRv2 is to > >be dropped. In the implementation I should be able to preserve support > >for OTRv2, but is this desirable? (I know the modes imply OTRv3 and/or > >4, still ...) > I think once OTRv4 is out of the door, just like OTRv1, OTRv2 should be > dropped. @ian? @nik?
I'm in principle fine with dropping v2 support. I wouldn't mind a quick look-around at what OTR implementations still don't support v3, though. pidgin-otr does, of course. What about Adium? Others? _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
