On Friday, September 10, 2004 3:30 AM
Robert Kehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesyesyes, that's what I meant - we're on go. It's the logic of
> 'patch' that saves us here, once again Larry Wall's work - bow, bow,
> bow.

Btw, in Kernel/System/EmailSubject.pm I changed lines 214ff. to not
default to 'Re: ', as it seems to not allow the empty string set in
Config.pm:

    if ($Param{Re}) {
        $Param{Subject} = ($Self->{ConfigObject}->Get('SubjectRe') ||
'')
            . $Param{Subject};
    }

This way, the (old) setting of using 'Re: ' from Defaults.pm becomes
active, even if we don't set it in Config.pm. But we are allowed to set
the empty string, too.

Great work! Hopefully, Martin implements it.

With kind regards,

Robert Kehl

-- 
Zwei Chancen, ein Tor - das nenne ich hundertprozentige
Chancenauswertung!
Roland Wohlfahrt

_______________________________________________
OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs
To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs
Support oder Consulting f�r Ihr OTRS System?
=> http://www.otrs.de/

Reply via email to