On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:47:18PM -0700, Gary Robinson via ots-dev wrote: Sorry, just noticed I missed this!
> Hello, > > As far as I can tell, the current OpenTimestamps implementation only gives > you a timestamp for the time the block with the merkle root was committed to > bitcoin. > > Am I wrong about that? > > In any case, it sounds like the Stamp/Beacon Trees approach creates the > possibility of a far more precise timestamp. Is that right, and are there > plans to add such improved accuracy to OpenTimestamps? Yes! Not sure when I'll get that done or what exactly that infrastructure will look like in terms of who exactly you'll be trusting. But that is my intent, and there is some interest from third-parties in running it. -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
