In my experience with such things, it's not a matter of "some routes will
be dropped", but "traffic to certain destinations will blackhole unless
there's a covering route in FIB."
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, Ross Tajvar via Outages wrote:
Surely it's better to drop some routes than to drop the whole session.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023, 5:26 PM Rubens Kuhl via Outages <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 7:22 PM Job Snijders via Outages
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 23:18, Steve Meuse via Outages
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Are people using max-prefix for iBGP sessions?
>>
>> That seems.....unwise.
>
>
>
> Yes, I find it hard to imagine what risks would be mitigated by
applying max-prefix limits to IBGP sessions.
TCAM limits, perhaps ?
Rubens
_______________________________________________
Outages mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
Blue Stream Fiber, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
_______________________________________________
Outages mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
