It looks like Microsoft services may be having issues again. One Drive not loading properly, Microsoft Store issues and other MS issues.
Regards, John-Paul Reed IT Consultant On Mon, Aug 5, 2024, 9:18 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Outages mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Outages digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Microsoft Azure, 365 and status page all apparently down. > (Shaun Potts) > 2. Re: Microsoft Azure, 365 and status page all apparently down. > (Josh Luthman) > 3. Centurylink down in Colorado (Casey Johnson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:09:11 -0400 > From: Shaun Potts <[email protected]> > To: Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> > Cc: Jeff Martinez <[email protected]>, Chris Adams via Outages > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [outages] Microsoft Azure, 365 and status page all > apparently down. > Message-ID: > < > camqvqdfa5sry7ofbkkb4gqnro992hen89tntojvgzc88h8h...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > i find it *really **really *hard to believe that you or your org doesn't > use AD, or GitHub, or any external service that interfaces with > Entra/AAD/whatever microsoft has named it this month, or <you name it here> > but if that's the case, good on you. other cloud providers have outages > too, just as bad, and in the grand scheme of things just as frequently, > just not recently. > > also worth saying, crowdstrike still wasn't a microsoft issue, aside from > being the affected platform. crowdstrike has caused kernel panics on linux > machines too *shrug* > > anyways, not looking to get into a nerd fight with someone who has > realistically done a lot for the world's internet infrastructure, > > it always just really saddens me when i see people in prestigious positions > in tech taking positions like this, which are really below people in their > station. i guess i would just say try to put on a better face as someone > people in tech should be looking up to instead of gaining internet points > by batting at low-hanging fruit when a major provider has a major outage. > > next time layer3 or akamai or <insert backbone provider here> has a major > outage, would you quickly jump to go "haha, not affected here either!" or > are you just letting personal bias get in the way of rational discourse? > > my $0.02 > > (p.s. neither of the companies i work for or make technical decisions for > have a huge foot in microsoft tech either, this is just me being purely > objective) > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:49?PM Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jul 30, 2024, at 18:37, Shaun Potts <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > right because no vendor any of us use has interdependencies with > > microsoft services > > > > That was exactly my point. Some people make choices which prove to have > > Microsoft dependencies, some don?t. It?s a choice. Some people make it > > each way. Then Microsoft has yet another outage, as they VERY FREQUENTLY > > do, and somehow, some people are surprised, all over again. But it was > > their choice. Some people try to convince themselves that Microsoft is > in > > the ?death and taxes? category. This is just your reminder that it?s > not, > > it?s in the ?self harm/own-goal? category. If you were affected, AGAIN, > > you could make other choices, and join the camp that doesn?t have > anything > > to complain about when Microsoft has an outage AGAIN. > > > > Admittedly, I was a bit worried at first when I saw airlines complaining > > about the Crowdstrike/Microsoft outage, but my travel was all on United, > > and it turned out that they hadn?t made the mistake of using either > > anywhere critical, just on kiosk display stuff. So, good for them, > though > > it would be better if they didn?t flirt with these kinds of risks at all, > > since they seemingly propagate when people aren?t paying attention. > > > > -Bill > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20240730/22c2f0a8/attachment-0001.htm > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:16:18 -0400 > From: Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > To: Shaun Potts <[email protected]> > Cc: Bill Woodcock <[email protected]>, Chris Adams via Outages > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [outages] Microsoft Azure, 365 and status page all > apparently down. > Message-ID: > < > can9qwj-+f6fjfheuxwvdkw24rz9xxr9v7vrrmqqtaveouja...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > PLEASE discuss in outages-discussion@ > > Please post any outage updates in outages@ > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 1:09?PM Shaun Potts via Outages < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > i find it *really **really *hard to believe that you or your org doesn't > > use AD, or GitHub, or any external service that interfaces with > > Entra/AAD/whatever microsoft has named it this month, or <you name it > here> > > but if that's the case, good on you. other cloud providers have outages > > too, just as bad, and in the grand scheme of things just as frequently, > > just not recently. > > > > also worth saying, crowdstrike still wasn't a microsoft issue, aside from > > being the affected platform. crowdstrike has caused kernel panics on > linux > > machines too *shrug* > > > > anyways, not looking to get into a nerd fight with someone who has > > realistically done a lot for the world's internet infrastructure, > > > > it always just really saddens me when i see people in prestigious > > positions in tech taking positions like this, which are really below > people > > in their station. i guess i would just say try to put on a better face as > > someone people in tech should be looking up to instead of gaining > internet > > points by batting at low-hanging fruit when a major provider has a major > > outage. > > > > next time layer3 or akamai or <insert backbone provider here> has a major > > outage, would you quickly jump to go "haha, not affected here either!" or > > are you just letting personal bias get in the way of rational discourse? > > > > my $0.02 > > > > (p.s. neither of the companies i work for or make technical decisions for > > have a huge foot in microsoft tech either, this is just me being purely > > objective) > > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:49?PM Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > On Jul 30, 2024, at 18:37, Shaun Potts <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > right because no vendor any of us use has interdependencies with > >> microsoft services > >> > >> That was exactly my point. Some people make choices which prove to have > >> Microsoft dependencies, some don?t. It?s a choice. Some people make it > >> each way. Then Microsoft has yet another outage, as they VERY > FREQUENTLY > >> do, and somehow, some people are surprised, all over again. But it was > >> their choice. Some people try to convince themselves that Microsoft is > in > >> the ?death and taxes? category. This is just your reminder that it?s > not, > >> it?s in the ?self harm/own-goal? category. If you were affected, AGAIN, > >> you could make other choices, and join the camp that doesn?t have > anything > >> to complain about when Microsoft has an outage AGAIN. > >> > >> Admittedly, I was a bit worried at first when I saw airlines complaining > >> about the Crowdstrike/Microsoft outage, but my travel was all on United, > >> and it turned out that they hadn?t made the mistake of using either > >> anywhere critical, just on kiosk display stuff. So, good for them, > though > >> it would be better if they didn?t flirt with these kinds of risks at > all, > >> since they seemingly propagate when people aren?t paying attention. > >> > >> -Bill > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > > Outages mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20240730/e231836b/attachment-0001.htm > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 14:11:22 +0000 > From: Casey Johnson <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [outages] Centurylink down in Colorado > Message-ID: > < > ph0pr17mb5487055dfff03645813f30feab...@ph0pr17mb5487.namprd17.prod.outlook.com > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Anyone with Lumen/Centurylink fiber or MPLS circuits in Colorado down? I > have 5 customers that are down hard right now. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/attachments/20240805/5fd7439a/attachment.htm > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Outages mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Outages Digest, Vol 190, Issue 1 > *************************************** >
_______________________________________________ Outages mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
