On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:37:25PM +0100, Alan Pevec wrote: > Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:13:52PM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > >>The previous patch set had an error and one development branch's changes > >>showed up twice, and two different change sets. So it was missing the bulk > >>of the configuration work. This patch set fixes that. > > > >If there are no objections, I'm going to push these upstream now and > >we'll fix any issues that come up afterward. > > ACK - I already pushed when I was flushing my patch queue, but forgot to > reply here. > Please verify I picked the right patch versions: > > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/ovirt/?p=ovirt/node.git;a=commitdiff;h=0727dd3b45347ba3b70c5536065819a4e9b7034c > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/ovirt/?p=ovirt/node.git;a=commitdiff;h=5470e00f914214db77739a405708bc6f07c9f616
That seems to be one step back from the last one I pushed. I had a change in changehost.py that both showed the current remote host and also had better handling when a host is selected but becomes unavailable. I'll rebase and add those changes. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpTmwTV09ptO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ovirt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ovirt-devel
