>> Lastly... We've gotten approvals from the Design and QE leads for the >> oVirt Node Spin Feature on their respective mailing lists. But Spin SIG >> seems to have disbanded. I'm following up with Fedora program manager >> (cc'd) to see what our next steps can be here.
... > AFAIK Jared Smith is taking SPIN SIG issue > > IRC Log: > > 19:36:00 <athmane> is ovirt node cloud-sig business ? > 19:36:43 <rbergeron> athmane: it's more spins-sig business, at the > moment, or "what to do in lieu of lack of spins-sig movement" business > 19:36:56 <rbergeron> i know jsmith is looking into it at the moment. > 19:36:57 <athmane> ok > 19:37:22 <rbergeron> if it's not getting traction, we could perhaps take > a look at it, but let's hold off and see where it gets in the next few > days. > 19:37:37 <rbergeron> but technically it's spins-sig stuffs. > 19:37:41 <jsmith> Gimme until early next week to try to get some > consensus on what to do to move forward > 19:38:12 <athmane> jsmith: ok Thanks for the context here. Based on Bruno's last comment on the spin sig list, the sig is basically saying that oVirt Node doesn't qualify as a spin and therefore is not in their jurisdiction to make a decision on: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-spins/2011-July/002036.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-spins/2011-July/002037.html _______________________________________________ Ovirt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ovirt-devel
