On 11/24/2016 03:20 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
This commit announces support for DPDK 16.11. Compaitibilty with DPDK
v16.07 is not broken yet thanks to only minor code changes being needed
for the upgrade.
Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <[email protected]>
---
.travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
INSTALL.DPDK-ADVANCED.rst | 4 ++--
INSTALL.DPDK.rst | 18 +++++++++---------
NEWS | 1 +
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 3 ++-
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
<snip />
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
index de78ddd..7564ad7 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
+++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
@@ -2593,7 +2593,8 @@ netdev_dpdk_vhost_class_init(void)
rte_vhost_driver_callback_register(&virtio_net_device_ops);
rte_vhost_feature_disable(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4
| 1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6
- | 1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM);
+ | 1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM
+ | 1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC);
ovs_thread_create("vhost_thread", start_vhost_loop, NULL);
ovsthread_once_done(&once);
Any reason you disable indirect descs?
Did you measure performance degradation with it?
Thanks,
Maxime
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
