On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 02:27:04PM -0500, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Aaron Conole <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > This series cleans up and clarifies certain issues in the checkpatch
> > infrastructure.  Additionally, a fix for the some of the matches is 
> > included.
> >
> > The two features added by this series are:
> > 1. The ability to parse a non-patch file (useful for applying cleanups to
> >    existing code)
> > 2. Printing the line number where a change occurs in the file, instead of
> >    in the patchfile.
> >
> > With these two features, a simple script
> >     for check_file in lib/*.c; do ./utilities/checkpatch.py -f $check_file; 
> > done
> >
> > will print a number of violations (hopefully, correctly!).
> >
> > Aaron Conole (7):
> >   checkpatch: Announce the file where errors occur
> >   checkpatch: Print the line in question distinctly
> >   checkpatch: convert some of the warnings
> >   checkpatch: Print file line numbers
> >   checkpatch: Fix signoff error
> >   checkpatch: Add file-parsing mode
> >   checkpatch: fix the if and whitespace checks
> >
> >  utilities/checkpatch.py | 92 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> Ping.  Is it possible to get this series reviewed?

I should be spending a lot of time this week on reviews.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to