Why are you telling us this?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:38:08PM +0530, Satyavalli Rama wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Currently we are implementing OXS as an independent infrastructure. > While sending OXS Flow Stat Request, we are facing the below issue. > We have dumped and verified the packet is in proper format only, but we are > not receiving the Reply. > > 2016-12-21T06:46:56Z|00016|vconn|DBG|unix:/usr/local/var/run/openvswitch/br0.mgmt: > sent (Success): OFPST_OXS_FLOW request (OF1.5) (xid=0x2): > 2016-12-21T06:46:56Z|00017|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due to 0-ms timeout > 2016-12-21T06:47:55Z|00018|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due to [POLLIN] on fd 4 > (<->/usr/local/var/run/openvswitch/br0.mgmt) at lib/stream-fd.c:155 > 2016-12-21T06:47:55Z|00019|vconn|DBG|unix:/usr/local/var/run/openvswitch/br0.mgmt: > received: OFPT_ECHO_REQUEST (OF1.5) (xid=0x0): 0 bytes of payload > 2016-12-21T06:47:55Z|00020|ofctl|DBG|received reply with xid 00000000 != > expected 02000000 > 2016-12-21T06:48:55Z|00021|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due to [POLLIN][POLLHUP] on > fd 4 (<->/usr/local/var/run/openvswitch/br0.mgmt) at lib/stream-fd.c:155 > ovs-ofctl: OpenFlow packet receive failed (End of file) > > Thanks and Regards > Satya Valli > > > -----Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: ----- > > ======================= > To: Satyavalli Rama <[email protected]> > From: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> > Date: 12/16/2016 10:23PM > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] reg: OpenVswitch Fields Implementation > ======================= > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:33:11PM +0530, Satyavalli Rama wrote: > > We are working on Openflow 15 EXT-334 i.e OpenFlow Extensible Flow Entry > > Statistics, as per OpenvSwitch fields implementation in the meta-flow.h, > > the key-value pairs for "OXS fields" to be added/declared separately or do > > we need to follow the existing NXM/OXM key-value pairs. > > > > Please clarify us, and please refer us some guidelines that we need to > > follow for implementing this Openvswitch fields. > > I don't think that OXS defines fields at all, so I'd expect their > implementation to be independent of existing infrastructure. > > =====-----=====-----===== > Notice: The information contained in this e-mail > message and/or attachments to it may contain > confidential or privileged information. If you are > not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, > review, distribution, printing or copying of the > information contained in this e-mail message > and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If > you have received this communication in error, > please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and > immediately and permanently delete the message > and any attachments. Thank you > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
