On 02/02/2017 03:21 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> Remove the experimental warning tag in documentation regarding OVS deployed
> via userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst      |    3 ---
>  Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst |    4 ----
>  README.rst                                |    6 +++---
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 

This should also be documented in the NEWS file. With that

Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>

> diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst 
> b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
> index fff0a1a..3018590 100644
> --- a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
> @@ -29,9 +29,6 @@ This document describes how to build and install Open 
> vSwitch using a DPDK
>  datapath. Open vSwitch can use the DPDK library to operate entirely in
>  userspace.
>  
> -.. warning::
> -  The DPDK support of Open vSwitch is considered 'experimental'.
> -
>  Build requirements
>  ------------------
>  
> diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst 
> b/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst
> index 0368527..ebd0c12 100644
> --- a/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst
> @@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ This version of Open vSwitch should be built manually with 
> ``configure`` and
>  been recently tested, and so Debian packages are not a recommended way to use
>  this version of Open vSwitch.
>  
> -.. warning::
> -  The userspace-only mode of Open vSwitch is considered experimental.  It has
> -  not been thoroughly tested.
> -
>  Building and Installing
>  -----------------------
>  
> diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst
> index f5cdaa5..90050e3 100644
> --- a/README.rst
> +++ b/README.rst
> @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ following features:
>  
>  The included Linux kernel module supports Linux 3.10 and up.
>  
> -Open vSwitch can also operate, at a cost in performance, entirely in 
> userspace,
> -without assistance from a kernel module.  This userspace implementation 
> should
> -be easier to port than the kernel-based switch.  It is considered 
> experimental.
> +Open vSwitch can also operate entirely in userspace without assistance from
> +a kernel module.  This userspace implementation should be easier to port than
> +the kernel-based switch.
>  
>  What's here?
>  ------------
> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to