On 02/02/2017 08:22 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote: >> On 02/02/2017 04:44 PM, Ian Stokes wrote: >>> Remove the experimental warning tag in documentation regarding OVS >>> deployed via userspace. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst | 3 --- >>> Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst | 4 ---- >>> NEWS | 2 ++ >>> README.rst | 6 +++--- >>> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst >>> b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst >>> index fff0a1a..3018590 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst >>> +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst >>> @@ -29,9 +29,6 @@ This document describes how to build and install >>> Open vSwitch using a DPDK datapath. Open vSwitch can use the DPDK >>> library to operate entirely in userspace. >>> >>> -.. warning:: >>> - The DPDK support of Open vSwitch is considered 'experimental'. >>> - >>> Build requirements >>> ------------------ >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst >>> b/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst >>> index 0368527 <sip:0368527>..ebd0c12 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst >>> +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/userspace.rst >>> @@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ This version of Open vSwitch should be built >>> manually with ``configure`` and been recently tested, and so Debian >>> packages are not a recommended way to use this version of Open vSwitch. >>> >>> -.. warning:: >>> - The userspace-only mode of Open vSwitch is considered experimental. >>> It has >>> - not been thoroughly tested. >>> - >>> Building and Installing >>> ----------------------- >>> >>> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS >>> index 5efcce2..8600f0e 100644 >>> --- a/NEWS >>> +++ b/NEWS >>> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ Post-v2.7.0 >>> - Tunnels: >>> * Added support to set packet mark for tunnel endpoint using >>> `egress_pkt_mark` OVSDB option. >>> + - Documentation: >>> + * OVS deployed in userspace mode no longer tagged as experimental. >> >> I think this would be a bit clearer. What do you think? >> >> --- a/NEWS >> +++ b/NEWS >> @@ -59,4 +59,5 @@ v2.7.0 - xx xxx xxxx >> * Removed support for IPsec tunnels. >> - DPDK: >> + * Removal of experimental tag. > > We can put it under a DPDK header like you have here, I wonder though is the > removal of experimental only relevant to DPDK or do we need to consider OVS > userspace without DPDK also? I would think both are well tested at this stage > so experimental could be removed for both. Thoughts? >
Fine by me. I just want it to be clear that it's removal is for/covers the DPDK datapath. >> >> >>> >>> v2.7.0 - xx xxx xxxx >>> --------------------- >>> diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst >>> index f5cdaa5..90050e3 100644 >>> --- a/README.rst >>> +++ b/README.rst >>> @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ following features: >>> >>> The included Linux kernel module supports Linux 3.10 and up. >>> >>> -Open vSwitch can also operate, at a cost in performance, entirely in >>> userspace, -without assistance from a kernel module. This userspace >>> implementation should -be easier to port than the kernel-based switch. >> It is considered experimental. >>> +Open vSwitch can also operate entirely in userspace without >>> +assistance from a kernel module. This userspace implementation >>> +should be easier to port than the kernel-based switch. >>> >>> What's here? >>> ------------ >>> > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
