Hi Yi, Both Joe and Jarno have indicated there are no principle problems merging our self-contained user-space patches for L3 tunneling. May I suggest that you (together with Jiri and Eric) focus on the datapath back-ports and the user-space patches on top needed to configure L3 tunnels in the net-next and OVS tree kernel module.
/Jan > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Stringer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, 07 February, 2017 18:55 > To: Yang, Yi Y <[email protected]> > Cc: Jan Scheurich <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 00/16] port Jiri Benc's L3 patchset to ovs > > On 7 February 2017 at 05:28, Yang, Yi Y <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jan, I know that, but per Joe's comments, it seems he won't merge your > > patch set unless the part in kernel side is merged before them. > It can't work without these three patches. > > I have primarily expressed concern about missing kernel patch > backports due to inconsistent backporting order. If Jan's series is > decoupled and still builds OK, tests OK, passes review, etc by itself > then I'm not sure I understand the dependency on the kernel patches. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
