yes, thanks. I will introduce cls_rule_destroy() and free the minimatch inside. --William
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Andy Zhou <az...@ovn.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:41 PM, William Tu <u9012...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Valgrind testcase 772: appctl - route/lookup6 reports the >> following definitely lost: >> xmalloc (util.c:112) >> miniflow_alloc (flow.c:2500) >> minimatch_init (match.c:1387) >> rt_entry_delete (ovs-router.c:274) >> ovs_router_del (ovs-router.c:384) >> process_command (unixctl.c:313) >> >> Signed-off-by: William Tu <u9012...@gmail.com> >> --- >> lib/ovs-router.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/lib/ovs-router.c b/lib/ovs-router.c >> index d98de20..53fb834 100644 >> --- a/lib/ovs-router.c >> +++ b/lib/ovs-router.c >> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ rt_entry_delete(uint32_t mark, uint8_t priority, >> res = __rt_entry_delete(cr); >> ovs_mutex_unlock(&mutex); >> } >> + minimatch_destroy(CONST_CAST(struct minimatch *, &rule.match)); >> return res; >> } >> > > Acked-by: Andy Zhou <az...@ovn.org>, > > May be this can be easier to read? > > diff --git a/lib/ovs-router.c b/lib/ovs-router.c > index d98de20..794fdde 100644 > --- a/lib/ovs-router.c > +++ b/lib/ovs-router.c > @@ -280,6 +280,9 @@ rt_entry_delete(uint32_t mark, uint8_t priority, > res = __rt_entry_delete(cr); > ovs_mutex_unlock(&mutex); > } > + > + cls_rule_destroy(&rule); > return res; > } _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
