On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:02:04PM -0800, Han Zhou wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > + <p> > > + Clusters larger than 5 servers will also work, with every 2 added > > + servers allowing the cluster to tolerate 1 more failure, but > > + performance decreases, especially write performance. > > Should it be clear that read performance should never be impacted? > And is the performance drop supposed to be linear? If yes, then it might be > justified to add more nodes to satisfy super large deployments whenever > needed? Although I believe 5 nodes are good enough for most large > deployments :)
It's a little early to speculate on the performance of the implementation, since it isn't implemented yet, but I'll try to add more about performance. There's also some question about the ideal mix between clustering and replication. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
