This test clearly demonstrates the bit order of labels in the OpenFlow
wire format.

Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <[email protected]>
---
 tests/ofp-actions.at | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/ofp-actions.at b/tests/ofp-actions.at
index 6f9f5c1..11b3653 100644
--- a/tests/ofp-actions.at
+++ b/tests/ofp-actions.at
@@ -192,6 +192,11 @@ ffff 0018 00002320 0007 001f 0001d604 000000000000f009
 ffff 0030 00002320 0023 0003 00000000 0000 FF 000000 0000 dnl
 ffff 0018 00002320 0007 001f 0001d604 000000000000f009
 
+# 
actions=ct(commit,exec(load:0->NXM_NX_CT_LABEL[64..127],load:0x1d->NXM_NX_CT_LABEL[0..63]))
+ffff 0048 00002320 0023 0001 00000000 0000 FF 000000 0000 dnl
+ffff 0018 00002320 0007 103f 0001d810 0000 0000 0000 0000 dnl
+ffff 0018 00002320 0007 003f 0001d810 0000 0000 0000 001d
+
 # bad OpenFlow10 actions: OFPBAC_BAD_SET_ARGUMENT
 & ofp_actions|WARN|cannot set CT fields outside of ct action
 ffff 0018 00002320 0007 001f 0001d604 000000000000f009
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to