On 4/10/17, 7:10 AM, "Stephen Finucane" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 15:28 +0000, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
> On 4/7/17, 6:58 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of
> Stephen Finucane" <[email protected] on behalf of steph
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> I wanted to find the mappings of DPDK versions to OVS versions.
> This was
> a little more difficult than expected. Resolve the issue by
> linking to
> it from the DPDK install guide.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
> b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
> index b947bd5..f29ac05 100644
> --- a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
> @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ This document describes how to build and
> install Open vSwitch using a DPDK
> datapath. Open vSwitch can use the DPDK library to operate
> entirely in
> userspace.
>
> +.. seealso::
> +
> + The :doc:`releases FAQ </faq/releases>` lists support for
> the required
> + versions of DPDK for each version of Open vSwitch.
> +
>
> If it is not intuitive to follow the path
> Open vswitch Documentation -> FAQ -> Releases,
> then perhaps it means
> “Releases” should also be linked at the same level as Installation
> Guides, Tutorials etc
> Releases is really one of first high topics people are interested in.
That would apply if you're navigating the docs from '/' and I see merit
in doing that. I'll reroll a v2 shortly. However, this wouldn't help
users navigating to the page from Google (like I was) and I think we
should keep this change itself.
Having both is what I was getting at; that is what I meant by “also”.
Thanks
>
> Build requirements
> ------------------
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Stephen
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
