>在 2017年5月3日,下午11:37,Kavanagh, Mark B <[email protected]> 写道:
>
>>>
>>> From: Michael Qiu <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> When doing packet clone, if packet source is from DPDK driver,
>>> multi-segment must be considered, and copy the segment's
>>> data one by one.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> lib/dp-packet.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/dp-packet.c b/lib/dp-packet.c
>>> index 79f6e7e..1093e4a 100644
>>> --- a/lib/dp-packet.c
>>> +++ b/lib/dp-packet.c
>>> @@ -165,9 +165,30 @@ dp_packet_clone_with_headroom(const struct dp_packet 
>>> *buffer, size_t
>>> headroom)
>>> {
>>>    struct dp_packet *new_buffer;
>>>
>>> -    new_buffer = dp_packet_clone_data_with_headroom(dp_packet_data(buffer),
>>> -                                                 dp_packet_size(buffer),
>>> -                                                 headroom);
>>> +    uint32_t size = dp_packet_size(buffer);
>>> +
>>> +    /* copy multi-seg data */
>>> +#ifdef DPDK_NETDEV
>>> +    if (buffer->source == DPBUF_DPDK && buffer->mbuf.nb_segs > 1) {
>>> +        uint32_t off_set = 0;
>>> +        void *dst = NULL;
>>> +        struct rte_mbuf *tmbuf = CONST_CAST(struct rte_mbuf *, 
>>> &(buffer->mbuf));
>>> +
>>> +        new_buffer = dp_packet_new_with_headroom(size, headroom);
>>> +        dst = dp_packet_put_uninit(new_buffer, size);
>>> +
>>> +        while (tmbuf) {
>>> +            rte_memcpy((char *)dst + off_set,
>>> +                       rte_pktmbuf_mtod(tmbuf, void *), tmbuf->data_len);
>>> +            off_set += tmbuf->data_len;
>>> +            tmbuf = tmbuf->next;
>>> +        }
>>> +    }
>>> +    else
>>> +#endif
>> Shouldn't this be #else, since the buffer has already been cloned for DPDK 
>> case?
>
>Because, if the nb_segs equal to 1, it will be the previous case.  so it 
>doesn't care the
>buffer source.

Yes, of course - please disregard that comment!

>
>
>>
>>> +        new_buffer = 
>>> dp_packet_clone_data_with_headroom(dp_packet_data(buffer),
>>> +                                                        size, headroom);
>>
>> Shouldn't this be #endif?
>>> +
>>>    new_buffer->l2_pad_size = buffer->l2_pad_size;
>>>    new_buffer->l2_5_ofs = buffer->l2_5_ofs;
>>>    new_buffer->l3_ofs = buffer->l3_ofs;
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to