On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:24:16AM -0700, Yi-Hung Wei wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for your valuable review. Yes, it makes sense to use 'struct flow' > instead of 'struct match' to represent metadata. > > As for the "pipeline fields", I briefly look at ovs-fields (7), and I think > the > patch series should be update to include at least the following fields. > * Tunnel fields: (tun_src/dst, tun_ipv6_src/dst, tun_gbp_id, > tun_gbp_flags, tun_flags, tun_metadata0 - tun_metadata63) > * Register fields: (reg0 - reg15, xreg0 - xreg7, xxreg0 - xxreg3) > > I will address these issues and send out a v2 soon.
OK, thank you! Maybe there should be an mf_*() function that identifies pipeline fields. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
