It might be good to add a test that checks that “all the fields” associated 
with tunnel header can be
matched in the underlay bridge context
I did a quick test with your patch:
ip_proto/nw_proto was fine and matching GRE
I could also successfully match on ip_dst/nw_dst but not on ip_src/nw_src, for 
example.



On 5/9/17, 4:55 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Zoltán 
Balogh" <[email protected] on behalf of 
[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi,
    
    I created a patch that updates flow and base_flow L2/L3 members when 
pushing packet to tunnel, and fixes statistics on underlay bridge. 
    I posted it to the original thread:
    
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_pipermail_ovs-2Ddev_2017-2DMay_332265.html&d=DwICAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=lNfYVOoPGZRl8beVCPBv23EX5aIqrWrIRcpodjAIkwE&s=6UWX4CTnpSwFgj4kj0bhBaDTfh5fldH_61-lbc9AG8U&e=
 
    
    As I see, you have not reverted the "Avoid recirculation" patch yet. If my 
new patch is accepted then it's not needed to revert the original commit. Could 
you have a look at the new patch, please?
    
    If you are going to revert the original patch, then I'm going to merge the 
new patch with the original one and resend it to the list.
    
    Best regards,
    Zoltan
    
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Stringer
    > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:41 AM
    > To: William Tu <[email protected]>
    > Cc: ovs-dev <[email protected]>
    > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "tunneling: Avoid recirculation 
on datapath."
    > 
    > On 8 May 2017 at 17:35, William Tu <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > Hi Joe and Greg,
    > >
    > > Maybe it's better I put this revert tunneling patch (1/2) and its
    > > tunnel-tests (2/2) in one patch, so the "make check" can pass?
    > 
    > They can be separate. It's currently broken, the revert will fix it.
    > The test can be an independent submission. I'd rather not fold yet
    > more changes into the revert.
    > _______________________________________________
    > dev mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=lNfYVOoPGZRl8beVCPBv23EX5aIqrWrIRcpodjAIkwE&s=x9d45zty5nZTMZsW3A2BSENnB72aAhk6Ed8hMQ3h_xA&e=
 
    _______________________________________________
    dev mailing list
    [email protected]
    
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=lNfYVOoPGZRl8beVCPBv23EX5aIqrWrIRcpodjAIkwE&s=x9d45zty5nZTMZsW3A2BSENnB72aAhk6Ed8hMQ3h_xA&e=
 
    





_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to