On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 21:27 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/internals/contributing/coding-style.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/internals/contributing/coding-style.rst > b/Documentation/internals/contributing/coding-style.rst > index 4694b2363775..666e887b1b68 100644 > --- a/Documentation/internals/contributing/coding-style.rst > +++ b/Documentation/internals/contributing/coding-style.rst > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ accept and ignore a null pointer argument. Code that > calls such a function > null-pointer check. We find that this usually makes code easier to read. > > Functions in ``.c`` files should not normally be marked ``inline``, because > it > -does not usually help code generation and it does suppress compilers warnings > +does not usually help code generation and it does suppress compiler warnings > about unused functions. (Functions defined in .h usually should be marked > inline.) >
Acked-by: Greg Rose <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
