On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 04:36:25PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > On 15 June 2017 at 03:15, Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 06:03:22PM +0300, Roi Dayan wrote: > >> This patch series introduces rule offload functionality to dpif-netlink > >> via netdev ports new flow offloading API. The user can specify whether to > >> enable rule offloading or not via OVS configuration. Netdev providers > >> are able to implement netdev flow offload API in order to offload rules. > >> > >> This patch series also implements one offload scheme for netdev-linux, > >> using TC flower classifier, which was chosen because its sort of natural > >> to state OVS DP rules for this classifier. However, the code can be > >> extended to support other classifiers such as U32, eBPF, etc which support > >> offload as well. > >> > >> The use-case we are currently addressing is the newly sriov switchdev mode > >> in the Linux kernel which was introduced in version 4.8. > >> This series was tested against sriov vfs vports representors of the > >> Mellanox 100G ConnectX-4 series exposed by the mlx5 kernel driver. > >> > >> The feature is disabled by default and can be enabled by setting > >> other_config:hw-offload to True. > >> Currently offloading is done for rules consisting on matching on L2 MAC, > >> L3 IP (not including IP flags), L4 TCP/UDP (not inclduing TCP flags), > >> VLAN, VXLAN tunnel. > >> HW offloading is supported only for drop and for single output action with > > > > Thanks Roi, > > > > I have applied these to the master branch > > (in two batches; 1 - 7 yesterday and the rest today). > > > > There were some follow-up requests from Flavio for some of the patches, > > please lets not forget those. > > Thanks all who've been involved in this work, it's a good start and I > look forward to seeing it become more fleshed out and become more > useful for a wider range of use cases. > > Looking over the commits, I see that there was no mention of > experimental status yet so I'll send a followup patch shortly to > address this. I don't think that this should surprise anyone, as I > raised this a few times with people at netdev 2.1.
Hi Joe, thanks for following up on that. I'll make sure it gets addressed properly. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
