Hi Anand,

Can you split this patch up instead to handle Conntrack.c and Conntrack-Nat.c 
in a separate one? This way we can keep the testing isolated to the changes.

Acking Conntrack.c change:

Acked-by: Sairam Venugopal <[email protected]>




On 6/22/17, 11:54 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Anand 
Kumar" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> 
wrote:

>In conntrack lookup, ICMP type and code fields were not being used to
>determine a matching entry. As a result, ICMP4_ECHO_REQUEST packet could
>be tracked as ICMP4_ECHO_REPLY packet and vice versa, which is invalid.
>
>To fix this, add ICMP type and code fields for matching a conntrack entry.
>Also updated OvsNatKeyAreSame() and OvsHashNatKey() to include these two
>fields.
>
>Signed-off-by: Anand Kumar <[email protected]>
>---
> datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack-nat.c | 32 ++++++++++----------------------
> datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack.c     | 16 +++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack-nat.c 
>b/datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack-nat.c
>index ae6b92c..f3c282c 100644
>--- a/datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack-nat.c
>+++ b/datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack-nat.c
>@@ -13,17 +13,11 @@ PLIST_ENTRY ovsUnNatTable = NULL;
> static __inline UINT32
> OvsHashNatKey(const OVS_CT_KEY *key)
> {
>-    UINT32 hash = 0;
>-#define HASH_ADD(field) \
>-    hash = OvsJhashBytes(&key->field, sizeof(key->field), hash)
>-
>-    HASH_ADD(src.addr.ipv4_aligned);
>-    HASH_ADD(dst.addr.ipv4_aligned);
>-    HASH_ADD(src.port);
>-    HASH_ADD(dst.port);
>-    HASH_ADD(zone);
>-#undef HASH_ADD
>-    return hash;
>+    UINT32 hash[3];
>+    hash[0] = OvsJhashBytes(&key->src, sizeof(key->src), 0);
>+    hash[1] = OvsJhashBytes(&key->dst, sizeof(key->dst), 0);
>+    hash[2] = OvsJhashBytes(&key->zone, sizeof(key->zone), 0);
>+    return OvsJhashWords(hash, 3, OVS_HASH_BASIS);
> }
> 
> /*
>@@ -35,17 +29,11 @@ OvsHashNatKey(const OVS_CT_KEY *key)
> static __inline BOOLEAN
> OvsNatKeyAreSame(const OVS_CT_KEY *key1, const OVS_CT_KEY *key2)
> {
>-    // XXX: Compare IPv6 key as well
>-#define FIELD_COMPARE(field) \
>-    if (key1->field != key2->field) return FALSE
>-
>-    FIELD_COMPARE(src.addr.ipv4_aligned);
>-    FIELD_COMPARE(dst.addr.ipv4_aligned);
>-    FIELD_COMPARE(src.port);
>-    FIELD_COMPARE(dst.port);
>-    FIELD_COMPARE(zone);
>-    return TRUE;
>-#undef FIELD_COMPARE
>+    return ((NdisEqualMemory(&key1->src, &key2->src,
>+                             sizeof(struct ct_endpoint))) &&
>+            (NdisEqualMemory(&key1->dst, &key2->dst,
>+                             sizeof(struct ct_endpoint))) &&
>+            (key1->zone == key2->zone));
> }
> 
> /*
>diff --git a/datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack.c 
>b/datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack.c
>index 07a9583..e97d6ce 100644
>--- a/datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack.c
>+++ b/datapath-windows/ovsext/Conntrack.c
>@@ -383,15 +383,13 @@ OvsDetectCtPacket(OvsForwardingContext *fwdCtx,
> BOOLEAN
> OvsCtKeyAreSame(OVS_CT_KEY ctxKey, OVS_CT_KEY entryKey)
> {
>-    return ((ctxKey.src.addr.ipv4 == entryKey.src.addr.ipv4) &&
>-        (ctxKey.src.addr.ipv4_aligned == entryKey.src.addr.ipv4_aligned) &&
>-        (ctxKey.src.port == entryKey.src.port) &&
>-        (ctxKey.dst.addr.ipv4 == entryKey.dst.addr.ipv4) &&
>-        (ctxKey.dst.addr.ipv4_aligned == entryKey.dst.addr.ipv4_aligned) &&
>-        (ctxKey.dst.port == entryKey.dst.port) &&
>-        (ctxKey.dl_type == entryKey.dl_type) &&
>-        (ctxKey.nw_proto == entryKey.nw_proto) &&
>-        (ctxKey.zone == entryKey.zone));
>+    return ((NdisEqualMemory(&ctxKey.src, &entryKey.src,
>+                             sizeof(struct ct_endpoint))) &&
>+            (NdisEqualMemory(&ctxKey.dst, &entryKey.dst,
>+                             sizeof(struct ct_endpoint))) &&
>+            (ctxKey.dl_type == entryKey.dl_type) &&
>+            (ctxKey.nw_proto == entryKey.nw_proto) &&
>+            (ctxKey.zone == entryKey.zone));
> }
> 
> static __inline VOID
>-- 
>2.9.3.windows.1
>
>_______________________________________________
>dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=Z6vowHUOjP5ysP_g372c49Nqc1vEKqHKNBkR5Q5Z7uo&m=RcKP7MCbcn9PTpNRinYsO9Q0x4MrsrHutzBQ0hweH2M&s=7sFDQthiIL809LnOAfhczTX9Lk7iZDvnFhR77N4DfbE&e=
> 
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to