> On Jul 3, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com> wrote: > >>> On Jul 3, 2017, at 3:22 AM, Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com> wrote: >>> >>> I have a small documentation and travis patch that I would like to see >> get into 2.7.1. >>> >>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/778288/ >>> >>> It just updates the docs and travis to point to DPDK 16.11.2 instead of >> 16.11.1, it's quite minimal. >>> >>> Would it be possible to have this as part of the 2.7.1 branch? >> >> Does this cause any sort of upgrade issues for people going from 2.7.0 to >> 2.7.1? I wouldn't normally expect to see that in a bug fix release, but I >> don't know how the DPDK dependencies work. I don't feel confident enough >> to review the patch. If you can get an acked-by and don't think it will >> cause any problems, I'll get it merged. >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Justin > Hi Justin, > > DPDK upgrades such as 16.11.1 to 16.11.2 consist of bug fixes only in DPDK, > no api/abi changes so DPDK will work as before for OVS. I'll put a request > for review to see if we can get this in as it is the latest DPDK we'd like to > point customers to.
Great. If it all possible, can you have the acked-by cc me so that I don't forget. Thanks, --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
