On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 09:32:47AM -0700, Han Zhou wrote: > > This patch introduces multi-threading for ovn-controller and use > > dedicated thread for packet-in processing as a start. It decouples > > packet-in processing and ovs flow computing, so that packet-in inputs > > won't trigger flow recomputing, and flow computing won't block > > packet-in processing. In large scale environment this largely reduces > > CPU cost and improves performance. > > > > Related effort and discussion: > > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-May/331813.html > > > > Signed-off-by: Han Zhou <[email protected]> > > Doesn't this still keep a second connection to the SB database, and a > second replica of its data, on every ovn-controller? Maybe I'm missing > something.
Right, this is not changed yet as mentioned in the cover letter. (This should be 3/3, and I can't remember why it was put 2/2 though). I described my thoughts and proposals and I need your input to decide which option to continue: https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-June/333927.html _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
