Patches 1 and 3 are also reviewed by Darrell now. So, maybe we can apply them before we finish our holy war about patch #2 ?
We can easily apply #3 without #2 because they have nothing in common. Best regards, Ilya Maximets. On 05.07.2017 17:30, Ilya Maximets wrote: > Hi all. > IMHO, these patches was reviewed and tested enough to be merged. > Does anybody have objections? > Ben, Darrell, what do you think? > > Best regards, Ilya Maximets. > > On 15.06.2017 14:36, Ilya Maximets wrote: >> Version 3: >> * Added comment about 'static_txq_id's adjustment. >> * Added additional parentheses around 'dynamic_txqs' >> comparison operand because of warning from GCC 6.3.1. >> >> Version 2: >> * Dropped patch [1/4] as already applied to master. >> * Fixed checkpatch warning in patch [2/4]. >> * 'reconfigure_pmd_threads' modified for better maintainability >> as suggested by Daniele Di Proietto in patch [2/4]: >> 1. delete old pmd threads >> 2. reconfigure if 'static_tx_qid's adjustment needed >> 3. add new pmd threads >> * Fixed locking of HW tx queues in case of big amount of >> available cores in patch [3/4]. >> * Dropped RFC tag for patch [4/4]. >> >> Ilya Maximets (3): >> dpif-netdev: Incremental addition/deletion of PMD threads. >> dpif-netdev: Avoid port's reconfiguration on pmd-cpu-mask changes. >> dpif-netdev: Don't uninit emc on reload. >> >> lib/dpif-netdev.c | 176 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- >> tests/pmd.at | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
