On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 11:07 PM Mehrdad Moradi via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have submitted another patch and tried to adhere to the points you > mentioned. Would you please guide me where I can confirm if it landed in > the correct pipeline?
It landed correctly. Take a look at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/[email protected]/ and https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/list/? Numan > > --Mehrdad > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 2:00 AM Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 1/29/26 11:51 PM, Mehrdad Moradi via dev wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Randomize DNS response IP order for load > > > balancing. > > > > > > When ovn-controller returns DNS responses with multiple IP addresses, > > > clients typically use the first IP in the list. Without randomization, > > > all clients direct traffic to the same backend, leading to uneven load > > > distribution. > > > > > > This patch implements Fisher-Yates shuffle on IPv4 and IPv6 address > > > arrays before building DNS answers, ensuring each query returns IPs > > > in a randomized order for better traffic distribution across backends. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mehrdad Moradi <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > v3: Fixed test script - removed 'local' keywords outside of functions > > > v2: Updated tests to handle randomized IP ordering in DNS responses > > > --- > > > controller/pinctrl.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > tests/ovn.at | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > > 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > Hi, Mehrdad. Thanks for the patch! > > > > This patch is for OVN, so it should have [PATCH ovn v3] subject prefix > > instead of simple [PATCH v3]. The "ovn" part signals to which patchwork > > instance this patch should go and where to apply it for CI. As you may > > have noticed, your change went into OVS patchwork and the 0-day robot > > attempted to apply it to OVS tree for testing and failed. > > > > Also, each version supposed to be a separate email, i.e. not a reply to > > a previous version and no quoting the previous emails. And the subject > > line should be the actual subject line, not a one embedded into the > > body of the email. Otherwise patchwork doesn't recognize them as separate > > patches. > > > > In general, I'd suggest to use 'git send-email' for sending patches, as > > it will take care of most of the aspects of patch submission for you. > > > > Also, try to not send more than one version per day to give reviewers > > some time to look at your patch and avoid clogging CI pipelines. > > Note that it normally takes quite a bit longer than one day to get some > > feedback. > > > > You can test your changes locally before submitting the patch, or you > > can use your own GitHub account to run most of the CI with GitHub Actions. > > > > Best regards, Ilya Maximets. > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
