On 4/2/26 12:01 PM, Ales Musil wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 9:53 PM Dumitru Ceara via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> When two switch ports are configured with the same requested-tnl-key, >> only one port gets the requested key while the other gets a random one. >> If the port whose request was satisfied is deleted, the remaining port's >> tunnel key was not updated until a full recompute. >> >> Fix this by tracking in the datapath whether any port had a >> requested-tnl-key conflict. When a port is deleted from such a >> datapath, fall back to recompute so the tunnel key is properly >> reassigned. >> >> The change is a bit aggressive and will trigger recomputes every time a >> port is deleted from such a switch but we're in a situation in which the >> configuration is incorrect so it's probably acceptable and definitely >> better than the old behavior of just remaining in an inconsistent state >> until a recompute happens (potentially for ever). >> >> Reported-at: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/FDP-3560 >> Assisted-by: Claude, with model: claude-opus-4-6 >> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> >> ---
... >> > Looks good to me, thanks. > > Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> > Hi Ales, Thanks for the review! Applied to main and all stable branches down to 24.03. Regards, Dumitru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
