Hi Dumitru, thanks for the patch.

Acked-by: Mark Michelson <[email protected]>

With regards to the CI failure, I posted patches for bumping the OVS submodule:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/[email protected]/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/[email protected]/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/[email protected]/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/[email protected]/

Hopefully those will help with CI stability.

On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 9:36 AM Dumitru Ceara via dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 5/20/26 12:25 PM, Dumitru Ceara via dev wrote:
> > physical_handle_flows_for_lport() handles the forward
> > dependency (PATCH/EXTERNAL/L3GATEWAY -> localnet) but
> > not the reverse: when a localnet port is added or
> > updated, chassisredirect ports on peer router datapaths
> > whose bridged redirect flows depend on that localnet
> > port (via put_remote_port_redirect_bridged() ->
> > get_localnet_port()) are not re-evaluated.
> >
> > This causes the CR bridged redirect flow in
> > OFTABLE_LOCAL_OUTPUT to be permanently missing when the
> > localnet port binding is processed incrementally without
> > a full recompute.
> >
> > Fix this by iterating peer router datapaths when a
> > localnet port is processed and re-evaluating any CR port
> > bindings found there.
> >
> > Add a test that deterministically exposes the bug by
> > pre-creating the OVS patch port so that non_vif_data
> > does not change when the localnet port binding arrives,
> > forcing pflow_output to use the incremental path.
> >
> > Fixes: 3ae8470edc64 ("I-P: Handle runtime data changes for pflow_output 
> > engine.")
> > Assisted-by: Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Code
> > Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > NOTE:
> > - on 25.03 this patch would need some minor changes:
> >   https://github.com/dceara/ovn/commit/54089ca
> > - that would allow us to also backport b408eedf6d9d
> >   ("ovn-controller: Skip type-update check for new port bindings.")
> >   to 25.03
> > - more context here:
> >   https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2026-May/432414.html
> > ---
>
> Known CI failure, we need an OVS submodule bump to pick up the OVS fixes
> for this.
>
> --- /dev/null   2026-05-20 10:47:47.504261528 +0000
> +++ /workspace/ovn-tmp/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/154/stdout
> 2026-05-20 10:57:31.808115116 +0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +2026-05-20T10:57:31.587Z|00483|ofproto_dpif_rid|ERR|recirc_id 2 left
> allocated when ofproto (br-int) is destructed
> +2026-05-20T10:57:31.587Z|00484|ofproto_dpif_rid|ERR|recirc_id 4 left
> allocated when ofproto (br-int) is destructed
> related-ports-diff:
> 154. ovn.at:10203: 154. ARP/ND from localnet -- proxy reply on resident
> chassis only -- parallelization=yes -- ovn_monitor_all=yes
> (ovn.at:10203): FAILED (ovn.at:10203)
>
> Recheck-request: github-robot-_Build_and_Test
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to