On 6/10/26 3:10 PM, Johan Thomsen wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
> 
> Sorry for the late follow-up.
> Your patch has now run without crashes in my setup for 36 hours and
> I'm unable to re-trigger a panic.
> 
>> But the operation in the diff above is kind of pointless as the memcpy
>> itself will copy the value again.
> 
> Right. So it would probably need at least a comment, if that ends up
> becoming the final fix.
> I'm not a kernel dev and I don't know what is the right thing to do here.
> 
> Happy to test alternative patches if needed.

OK.  Thanks for testing.

> 
> BR
> Johan
> 
> Den man. 8. jun. 2026 kl. 11.41 skrev Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>:
>>
>> On 6/8/26 10:25 AM, Johan Thomsen wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am seeing what looks like a kernel bug in the Geneve/OVS/vhost
>>> transmit path on a Talos Linux node running Kube-ovn with Geneve
>>> overlay and KubeVirt VM traffic.
>>>
>>> Environment:
>>>
>>> Kernel: 6.18.33-talos
>>> Distro: Talos v1.13.3
>>>
>>> Compiler/config:
>>>
>>> CONFIG_CC_VERSION_TEXT="clang version 22.1.2"
>>> CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG=y
>>> CONFIG_LTO=y
>>> CONFIG_LTO_CLANG=y
>>> CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN=y
>>> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y
>>>
>>> Hardware: HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen11, AMD EPYC
>>>
>>> NIC driver: bnxt_en
>>>
>>> Workload/network:
>>>
>>> Kube-OVN, Geneve overlay
>>> Open vSwitch datapath
>>> KubeVirt/QEMU VM traffic via vhost/tap
>>>
>>> Relevant console output:
>>>
>>> [  648.742603] memcpy: detected buffer overflow: 104 byte write of
>>> buffer size 96
>>> [  648.749907] WARNING: CPU: 61 PID: 27020 at
>>> lib/string_helpers.c:1036 __fortify_report+0x45/0x60
>>> [  648.758689] Modules linked in: dm_round_robin dm_multipath lpfc
>>> nvmet_fc nvmet intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common ahci nvme_auth bnxt_en
>>> nvme hpilo hkdf libahci sp5100_tco watchdog k10temp
>>> [  648.775429] CPU: 61 UID: 107 PID: 27020 Comm: vhost-27002 Not
>>> tainted 6.18.29-talos #1 PREEMPT(none)
>>> [  648.784735] Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen11/ProLiant DL325
>>> Gen11, BIOS 2.84 11/05/2025
>>> [  648.890478]  skb_tunnel_info_unclone+0x179/0x190
>>> [  648.895152]  geneve_xmit+0x7fe/0xe00
>>> [  648.907240]  dev_hard_start_xmit+0xa7/0x1f0
>>> [  648.911479]  __dev_queue_xmit+0x864/0xf40
>>> [  648.919688]  do_execute_actions+0x9b9/0x1be0
>>> [  648.927727]  ovs_execute_actions+0x58/0x170
>>> [  648.931960]  ovs_dp_process_packet+0xb1/0x1c0
>>> [  648.936370]  ovs_vport_receive+0x90/0x100
>>> [  648.940428]  netdev_frame_hook+0x146/0x1a0
>>> [  648.954093]  __netif_receive_skb+0x3f/0x160
>>> [  648.958324]  process_backlog+0x10c/0x210
>>> [  648.962295]  __napi_poll+0x2f/0x190
>>> [  648.965832]  net_rx_action+0x2e3/0x500
>>> [  648.969632]  handle_softirqs+0xe7/0x310
>>> [  648.985387]  tun_get_user+0x137e/0x1510
>>> [  649.005878]  handle_tx+0x41f/0xd30
>>> [  649.029014]  vhost_run_work_list+0x52/0x90
>>> [  649.033162]  vhost_task_fn+0xc2/0x140
>>> [  649.064145] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>> [  649.068820] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [  649.073489] kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:1043!
>>>
>>> I don't know whether this is a real overflow or a FORTIFY false-positive.
>>
>> Looks like a false-positive from the __counted_by fortification.
>>
>> I'd guess something like this would fit it:
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/dst_metadata.h b/include/net/dst_metadata.h
>> index 1fc2fb03ce3f9..e51c3795da474 100644
>> --- a/include/net/dst_metadata.h
>> +++ b/include/net/dst_metadata.h
>> @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ static inline struct metadata_dst 
>> *tun_dst_unclone(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>         if (!new_md)
>>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> +       new_md->u.tun_info.options_len = md_size;
>>         memcpy(&new_md->u.tun_info, &md_dst->u.tun_info,
>>                sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info) + md_size);
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_DST_CACHE
>> ---
>>
>> Johan, could you try this in your setup?
>>
>> The memory was actually allocated for the options, but the structure
>> is zeroed out on allocation, so the __counted_by check doesn't work
>> properly for the initial initialization copy.
>>
>> But the operation in the diff above is kind of pointless as the memcpy
>> itself will copy the value again.  So, I'm not sure if that's the right
>> solution here.
>>
>> Alternative might be to revert the kmalloc_flex back to the simple
>> kmalloc in metadata_dst_alloc.

A little less icky alternative might be to just split the copy in two:

diff --git a/include/net/dst_metadata.h b/include/net/dst_metadata.h
index 1fc2fb03ce3f9..996ae8350360a 100644
--- a/include/net/dst_metadata.h
+++ b/include/net/dst_metadata.h
@@ -164,8 +164,12 @@ static inline struct metadata_dst *tun_dst_unclone(struct 
sk_buff *skb)
        if (!new_md)
                return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
+       /* Copy in two stages to keep the __counted_by happy. */
        memcpy(&new_md->u.tun_info, &md_dst->u.tun_info,
-              sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info) + md_size);
+              sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info));
+       memcpy(ip_tunnel_info_opts(&new_md->u.tun_info),
+              ip_tunnel_info_opts(&md_dst->u.tun_info),
+              md_size);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DST_CACHE
        /* Unclone the dst cache if there is one */
        if (new_md->u.tun_info.dst_cache.cache) {
---

Adding netdev maintainers for more opinions.

>>
>> CC: Kees
>>
>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>>
>>>
>>> I cannot reproduce the issue on Talos v1.12.X which uses a gcc built
>>> kernel, whereas the affected kernel is built with clang. Don't know
>>> whether this is relevant here.
>>>
>>> I am currently trying to make a reliable reproducer, but I can almost
>>> always trigger the issue when iperf stressing the VM-network.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if this should go to a more specific
>>> maintainer/list or further info is needed. I am able to test candidate
>>> patches if provided.
>>>
>>> Downstream bug reports:
>>> https://github.com/siderolabs/talos/issues/13440
>>> https://github.com/kubeovn/kube-ovn/issues/6767
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Johan
>>

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to