> On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:06 PM, Numan Siddique <nusid...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Jul 17, 2017, at 8:51 PM, Guru Shetty <g...@ovn.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On 17 July 2017 at 12:51, Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Jul 17, 2017, at 7:49 AM, Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 17/07/17 11:10, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> For tripleo, we need OVS 2.7.1 for OVN DB HA support, but we can't take 
> >> >> v2.7.1 for this issue. I think we should atleast revert the patch for 
> >> >> 2.7 branch  and have a new version 2.7.2.
> >> >>
> >> > If we are having a 2.7.2 release specially for this it makes sense to 
> >> > revert it.
> >> >
> >> > In addition can you test/apply the updated patch, 
> >> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-July/335560.html as 
> >> > I was hitting the issue with the persistant ports setup, it would be 
> >> > good to see your case is also fixed.
> >>
> >> Han and Numan, it sounds like Eelco's original patch fixed an issue, but 
> >> it's introducing problems for more common workloads.  Can you try it on 
> >> the tip of "branch-2.7" and see if it resolves the issues you're seeing?  
> >> I'd suggest if it doesn't fix the problems, we revert Eelco's orignal 
> >> patch and release 2.7.2.  If it does, and people think it's reasonably 
> >> safe, we can release 2.7.2 with the patches.
> >
> > Let me know if anyone has a different view on how we should proceed.
> >
> > IMO, we should just revert this patch for 2.7 branch till we have a proper 
> > fix. If we apply another patch in haste to fix this issue without letting 
> > it bake for more testing and immediately release 2.7.2, we may just end up 
> > with a different bug.
> >
> > I tested the revert on tip of branch-2.7 and it atleast fixes the issue 
> > where geneve tunnels across 2 hosts start to work again and I also do not 
> > see the "open failed (File exists))" error too.
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me.  Does anyone else have any opinions?  If I don't 
> hear anything by late tomorrow morning (PDT), I'll revert the patch and 
> release 2.7.2.
> 
> 
> Reverting the patch and a release 2.7.2 sounds fine to me. 

Are you okay with that, Eelco?  Unless anyone objects, we'll leave the commit 
on master and look at applying your new patch.

--Justin


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to