On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:05:10 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > [Low] test_sctp_nat_connect_v4() > can a forked socat child outlive teardown here?
Same pattern as test_sctp_connect_v4() and test_sctp_connect_v6(): fork on the listener, SIGTERM only the pid that ovs_netns_spawn_daemon() recorded. A process-group kill inside that helper would change every caller. Aaron already called that overkill. I am leaving the existing convention. No respin for this comment. Thanks, Minxi _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
