On 10/6/26 9:52 AM, Ales Musil wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 3:12 PM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/5/26 3:06 PM, Michal Arbet wrote:
>>> Hi Dumitru,
>>>
>>
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>>> You're welcome :)..I was also checking the same stuff...why our (Ultimum)
>>> patches don't pass in GitHub and locally they does...
>>>
>>> It should be fine to merge this soon, so we can send a several larger
>>> changes around BFD...
>>>
>>
>> If no other maintainer beats me to it, I can probably merge it tomorrow.
>>  But I think you can just go ahead and post the other patches you want
>> to post, we'll know this IGMP thing is a known test issue and we can
>> ignore it.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dumitru
>>
>>> Thank you for your support !
>>>
>>> Michal Arbet
>>> Openstack Engineer
>>>
>>> Ultimum Technologies
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/Ultimum+Technologies?entry=gmail&source=g>
>> a.s.
>>> Na Poříčí 1047/26, 11000 Praha 1
>>> Czech Republic
>>>
>>> +420 604 228 897 <+420%20604%20228%20897>
>>> [email protected]
>>> *https://ultimum.io <https://ultimum.io/>*
>>>
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/ultimum-technologies> |
>> Twitter
>>> <https://twitter.com/ultimumtech> | Facebook
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ultimumtechnologies/timeline>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2026, 2:56 PM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/5/26 2:38 PM, Michal Arbet wrote:
>>>>> Scapy 2.8.0 moved the IGMPv3 layers to scapy.layers.igmp and kept
>>>>> scapy.contrib.igmpv3 only as a deprecated alias.  IGMPv3mr is now
>>>>> IGMPv3_MR, a complete Membership Report that carries its own type
>>>>> and checksum.  The "IGMPv3(type=0x22) / IGMPv3mr(...)" packet used by
>>>>> the "Traffic from external port not looped back to localnet" test is
>>>>> therefore built with two report headers, and the first one has zero
>>>>> group records.  pinctrl learns no group from it and the test fails
>>>>> waiting for the 239.1.2.3 IGMP_Group row.
>>>>>
>>>>> No scapy construction produces the same packet with both 2.7 and 2.8,
>>>>> so build the report with the send_igmp_v3_report() helper that the
>>>>> other IGMP tests already use.
>>>>>
>>>>> Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Code
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Arbet <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Hi Michal,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for the fix!
>>>>
>>>> I was looking at this issue in disbelief this morning trying to
>>>> understand why it "works on my machine" and not in GitHub CI. :)
>>>>
>>>> Assuming ovsrobot reports green CI with this patch:
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dumitru
>>>>
>>>>>  tests/ovn.at | 12 +++++-------
>>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at
>>>>> index 136b825f9..e0796a76c 100644
>>>>> --- a/tests/ovn.at
>>>>> +++ b/tests/ovn.at
>>>>> @@ -47594,13 +47594,11 @@ mld_packet=$(fmt_pkt \
>>>>>  check as hv1 ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive br-phys_n1 $mld_packet
>>>>>
>>>>>  # IGMPv3 report.  Same scenario but with IPv4 multicast.
>>>>> -igmp_packet=$(fmt_pkt \
>>>>> -    "Ether(dst='01:00:5e:00:00:16', src='50:54:00:00:00:01') / \
>>>>> -     IP(src='10.0.0.1', dst='224.0.0.22', ttl=1, \
>>>>> -        options=IPOption_Router_Alert()) / \
>>>>> -     IGMPv3(type=0x22) / \
>>>>> -     IGMPv3mr(records=IGMPv3gr(rtype=4, maddr='239.1.2.3'))")
>>>>> -check as hv1 ovs-appctl netdev-dummy/receive br-phys_n1 $igmp_packet
>>>>> +send_igmp_v3_report br-phys_n1 hv1 \
>>>>> +    505400000001 $(ip_to_hex 10 0 0 1) f9f8 \
>>>>> +    $(ip_to_hex 239 1 2 3) 04 e8f9 \
>>>>> +    igmp_packet.txt
>>>>> +igmp_packet=$(cat igmp_packet.txt)
>>>>>
>>>>>  # Wait for pinctrl to fully process the IGMP/MLD reports and sync them
>>>>>  # to the SB database.  This guarantees that pinctrl has also
>> re-injected
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> Thank you Michal and Dumitru,
> 
> I added the missing "Fixes" tag and applied this to main and 26.09.
> 

Thanks, Ales, for merging this!  I think we're also missing it on 26.03
(LTS) so I cherry picked it there too now.

Regards,
Dumitru

> Regards,
> Ales
> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to